Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matt Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> What would you *like* to be contributing to? Like it or not, that's
> a big part of the question. If you're planning to get heavily
> involved, you, presuming you're capable, may have a lot to say about
>
It's been rumoured that brad said:
> Downloading the source for version 1.0.18 and doing a "make" with a
> "make install" then trying to run xacc gives the following error:
>
>exec: xacc-static.bin: not found
Normally, both a dynamic-linked and static-linked version of xacc would be built;
b
It's been rumoured that zeek said:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I've tried many combinations of RPM to get xacc working. However, regardless
> of the revision I always end up with the same error:
>
> error: failed dependencies:
> libXm.so.2 is needed by xacc-1.0.18-1
whoever built this rpm did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It's been rumoured that Matt Armstrong said:
> >
> > I just ran across a personal finance package for Gnome:
> >
> > http://jagger.me.berkeley.edu/~dfisher/gnofin/
> >
> > Its goals are much simpler than GnuCash. It even claims that "if you
> > are looking for a fe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ho about putting up more gnome screenshots? You'd mailed one that had
> gnome w/ some kind of "green swiss cheese" skin that I got a kick out of;
> but this one is not on the website ...
>
There should be two screenshots on the new site with that "green swiss
cheese
Downloading the source for version 1.0.18 and doing a "make" with a
"make install" then trying to run xacc gives the following error:
exec: xacc-static.bin: not found
Ooops!
:-(
Brad
begin:vcard
n:Kieser;Bradley
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Kieser Consultancy Limited
adr:;;
version:2.1
Greetings,
I've tried many combinations of RPM to get xacc working. However, regardless
of the revision I always end up with the same error:
error: failed dependencies:
libXm.so.2 is needed by xacc-1.0.18-1
The lesstif RPMs I've tried all include:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libMrm.so
/usr/X11R
On 30-May-1999, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you propose? Should I knock myself out anyway? Is there a
> well-known fix? How about some RPM spec files? I can build an RPM for
> XmHTML-1.1.7, maybe ...
You may want to take a look at the diff I made when packaging
XmHTML-1.1
Hi Linas,
> I got tired of all those complaints about XmeDrawShadows & and gnucash
> this & that, and decided to take the bull by the horns. And hit a wall;
> I need your help. Here's some background:
>
> 1) instaled the latest lesstiff RPM i could find, 0.87.1 (I'd previously
>used a comme
