Have just created gnome-2-28 branch of gnome-themes, for bugfixes and
translations only. Development will continue on master.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum.ben...@sun.comOpenSolaris Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/
Have just branched gnome-themes for 2.26. Feature development should
continue on trunk, gnome-2-26 is for translations and bugfixes only.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum.ben...@sun.comJava Desktop System Group
http://i
Hi,
DL updated.
Cheers,
El dl 22 de 09 de 2008 a les 16:27 +0100, en/na Calum Benson va
escriure:
> Have just branched gnome-themes for 2.24. Feature development should
> continue on trunk, gnome-2-24 is for translations and bugfixes only.
>
> Cheeri,
> Calum.
--
gil forcada
[ca] guifi.ne
Have just branched gnome-themes for 2.24. Feature development should
continue on trunk, gnome-2-24 is for translations and bugfixes only.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Group
http://ie.s
Have just branched gnome-themes for 2.23; the gnome-2-22 branch is
now for translations and bugfixes only please.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Group
http://ie.sun.com
Have just branched gnome-themes for 2.21/22; the gnome-2-20 branch is
now for translations and bugfixes only please.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Group
http://ie.sun.com
Have just branched gnome-themes for 2.20; translations and bugfixes only
on gnome-2-18 branch please.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Group
http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 23:23 +0100, Daniel Borgmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 11:22 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > > Well, just a brainstorming of long and short term tasks:
> > > 1. put Clearlooks engine in gtk-engines, enabling progress bar
> > > animation :-)
> >
> > Clearlooks
This is just the questioning opinion of someone whose great contribution
to anything free software is the fixing of one bug in one program, and
has neither engineered nor utilised any software accessibility except
for messing around with the features, but isn't [at least] the second
icon a little t
Il giorno sab, 19/03/2005 alle 11.22 +, Thomas Wood ha scritto:
> On 19 Mar 2005, at 9:44 am, Luca Ferretti wrote:
>
> > 13. add a gnome-fs-computer icon in g-i-t. Currently we are using
> > gnome-fs-client for Computer desktop icon: this is bad.
> >
>
> Hopefully jimmac will have
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 11:22 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > Well, just a brainstorming of long and short term tasks:
> > 1. put Clearlooks engine in gtk-engines, enabling progress bar
> > animation :-)
>
> Clearlooks is now in gtk-engines. Progress bar animation won't be
> enabled by d
On 19 Mar 2005, at 9:44 am, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno lun, 07/03/2005 alle 16.00 +, Thomas Wood ha scritto:
Now that this is branched, would it be a good time to try putting
Industrial in?
It could be interesting.
Anyway, it's definitely the time for discussion as to what is included
for 2
Il giorno lun, 07/03/2005 alle 16.00 +, Thomas Wood ha scritto:
> Now that this is branched, would it be a good time to try putting
> Industrial in?
It could be interesting.
> Anyway, it's definitely the time for discussion as to what is included
> for 2.12. We need discussion on this list r
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 13:41 -0500, Christopher James Lahey wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:50 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:00 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > > >
> > > Now that this is branched, would it be a good time to try putting
> > > Indust
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:50 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:00 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > >
> > Now that this is branched, would it be a good time to try putting
> > Industrial in?
> Considering that there is no separate Industrial icon theme anymore
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:50 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:00 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> > >
> > Now that this is branched, would it be a good time to try putting
> > Industrial in?
> Considering that there is no separate Industrial icon theme anymore
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:00 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
> >
> Now that this is branched, would it be a good time to try putting
> Industrial in?
Considering that there is no separate Industrial icon theme anymore as per
earlier mail,
I am not sure if I consider the metacity and gtk theme exciting e
Forwarded Message
> From: Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org ,
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: gnome-themes branched for 2.10
> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:10:33 +
>
> g
18 matches
Mail list logo
