On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 11:47, 0x90 wrote:
> Where is the man power to migrate or replace all these applications?
Migrate to what? There's no real alternative to the tray in Gtk AFAIK.
AppIndicator could work, but GNOME Shell doesn't even support it out of the box
(only via an extension
https:/
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 13:44, 0x90 wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/gnome/comments/53d5kz/need_dev_info_about_legacy_traytopicons_plus_in/
>
> To achieve this goal, all apps need to be redesigned.
After reading the thread I still don't know what the replacement is. Just
r
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 15:58, Sam Bull wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:42 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 14:31 +0200, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 13:44, 0x90 wrote:
> > > > See this thread:
> > > &g
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, at 20:42, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 16:05 +0200, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > While it makes sense for some applications, like email, it's rather
> > confusing for something like an IRC client: I don't want it to run at
> &g
Hi,
for me Pixel Saver still works on Wayland. Is that because of XWayland?
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, at 10:57, Amaury SECHET wrote:
> Hi all,
> Several very popular extensions undecorate maximized windows. This is
> very useful for smaller laptops for instance.
>
> This can be done, for inst
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, at 20:10, François Guerraz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That's probably because you think you're using waylaid but you aren't.
>
> Thy this:
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/202891/how-to-know-whether-wayland-or-x11-is-being-used
Xwayland is running, no Xorg p
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, at 18:13, William Di Luigi wrote:
> Right now, the task of showing icons on the desktop is carried out by
> nautilus. This is apparently an issue for Wayland, so maybe the task could
> just be delegated to gnome-shell instead.
I think that's a good idea. Having files on the d
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016, at 01:08, rastersoft wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I want to distribute a gnome shell extension with a program that I made,
> to allow to better integrate it with gnome shell. The problem is that,
> after copying the files in the system
> (usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/myextens
Hi,
I took over as a maintainer of
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/615/appindicator-support/, see
https://github.com/rgcjonas/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/issues/56
What is needed (who to ask) in order to move the ownership of the extensions at
extensions.gnome.org, so that I can
Thank you :)
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, at 17:50, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:10 PM Jan Niklas Hasse
> wrote:
>> What is needed in order to move the ownership of the extensions at
>> extensions.gnome.org
>
> Generally speaking: Some proof that you
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017, at 19:46, Albert Vaca wrote:
> Then, if a notification is not persistent, this means you can no longer
> interact with it, which results in a bad user experience.
>
> I've found myself subconsciously learning to approach notifications slowly
> and with care to avoid thi
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, at 12:40, J (Jean-Claude Gervais) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried installing a shell-extension that promised to control
> aspects of dual-monitor setups but the extension was not compatible
> with the newer version of gnome I am running, so it does not run but it
> appears t
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, at 02:58, Florian Müllner wrote:
> * Remove legacy status icon tray [Florian; #785956]
To make this less painfull for users, what do you think about adding native
support for a DBus based approach like
https://github.com/rgcjonas/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator ?
Otherw
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, at 18:33, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:32 AM Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, at 02:58, Florian Müllner wrote:
>> > * Remove legacy status icon tray [Florian; #785956]
>>
>> To make this less painful
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, at 02:10, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, at 18:33, Florian Müllner wrote:
> >> (Unfortunately the release was already overdue, so we had to push the
> >> change in time fo
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, at 08:38, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I've created a gnome-shell extension that I'd like to run under GDM,
> but it doesn't seem that GDM is capable of loading extensions. Is this
> correct?
Yes, this is correct. Have a look at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787454#
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, at 15:51, Jason DeRose wrote:
> What one user calls "supported" another calls "stale". Just because a session
> enables an extension doesn't necessarily mean the user wants the old version
> of the extension.
He can use the vanilla GNOME session then.
> (I don't like that
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, at 18:38, Charlie wrote:
> hey guys. i thought i’d bring up a bug that i’ve already reported about on
> launchpad during the shakedown period of ubuntu 17.10 during development.
>
> i get some very odd flickering/pixelation/box shadows that seem to only occur
> when i u
18 matches
Mail list logo
