Hi devs,
Why does gnome-shell go into activities view only when the super key
is released and not just pressed?
(i.e Press and Release super key => Event to go to activities view)
And to return back, it is just a press of Super key.
What is the design philosophy behind this inconsistency?
In my
Hi,
I want to report a important problem with mutter/gnome-shell as it hinders
browsing/viewing experience in gnome-shell sessions.
I have a Nvidia 7300GT Graphics card based system and uses latest nvidia
proprietary drivers. After upgrading to Gnome3(gnome-shell), image rendering
and browsing
Hello list,
I am desparately trying to get used to Gnome 3 but a few things are
constantly in conflict with experience from other window managers. Do you
know how to:
* Arrange desktops horizontally so that I can use Ctrl-Alt-Left/Right
buttons instead of Up/Down to switch?
* Disable autom
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> * Arrange desktops horizontally so that I can use Ctrl-Alt-Left/Right
> buttons instead of Up/Down to switch?
I do not think it is possible to arrange them horizontally and it
would not work well with the overview but it used to b
Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 08:22 +, prakash j kokkkattu a écrit :
> As a Last resort, I tried nouveau driver. with nouveau driver,
> Gnome-3.2 shell is working fine.
Please report this to NVidia. That's most probably their fault, since it
doesn't happen with Nouveau. GNOME developers cannot fi
Hi,
On Mar 21, 2012 11:45 AM, "elison.ni...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Why does gnome-shell go into activities view only when the super key
> is released and not just pressed?
Mainly to allow the use of in keyboard shortcuts, e.g. when another
key is pressed while is held, we do not trigger the overv
It just occurs to me that it might come in handy having the clock
showing somehow if there are activities recorded for today.
Most times I don't really check for it, so I think It could be useful to
have reminder on that by just looking at the clock.
Best regards,
--
Hi everybody,
I have a problem with a Java application that sets its WM_CLASS value to
either "wm-class-a" or "wm-class-b" (the two real ones are garbage, e.g.
java-lang-thread). The application is beyond my control and I can't
modify it for setting a saner WM_CLASS.
I can install the desktop fil