It triggers when I add a workspace and put the app on it, then the icons
are too small. Also, in the overview, Window titles are difficult to
read because the (title)text blends in the black background.
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 07:42 +, Marco Piazza wrote:
> Owen Taylor writes:
>
> > * New lay
Hi!
> Although I have these errors(chosen option [2]):
Choose [4] Start Shell and type git reset --hard HEAD
That should fix it.
Regards,
Johannes
___
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gno
I like the new shell design, but with it comes a fairly big issue IMHO:
I cant get to Nautilus now without some work.
I have no desktop icons, so there is no "computer" on the desktop. I
was hooked on getting to my home directory and recent docs in the panel
on the left in the old shell layou
I personally think that icon size is perfect as is.
If some people needs bigger icons, then the icon size should be
increased through the Universal Access (Large Text option maybe).
The bar on the right in the exposé view will be really great when we
will see the other workspaces with the open app
Awesome :-)
But I miss grid view :-(
From: Owen Taylor
To: gnome-announce-l...@gnome.org
Cc: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Sent: Mon, 29 November, 2010 23:36:32
Subject: GNOME Shell 2.91.3 released
GNOME Shell 2.91.3 is now available at:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pu
+1
It seems more logical to put the "file, edit, view etc." menu up the top as in
Mac OSX, it would save room and makes more sense to me than putting the windows
buttons up there
it would also make sense as the app menu up there, while saving vertical space
at the same time
-Sean
-1
If you have more than one window open at a time having a unified menu bar is
not very nice.
On 30 November 2010 16:30, Sean Dunwoody wrote:
> +1
>
> It seems more logical to put the "file, edit, view etc." menu up the top as
> in Mac OSX, it would save room and makes more sense to me than pu
Only one window is focused at any given time
Regards,
Allan Caeg
User Experience Designer
http://google.com/profiles/AllanCaeg
+63 918 948 2520
Sent mobile
On Dec 1, 2010 12:39 AM, "Derek Ekins" wrote:
> -1
> If you have more than one window open at a time having a unified menu bar
is
> not very
Yeah but IMO it is hard to associate what window the menu is for
On 30 November 2010 16:50, Allan Caeg wrote:
> Only one window is focused at any given time
>
> Regards,
> Allan Caeg
> User Experience Designer
> http://google.com/profiles/AllanCaeg
> +63 918 948 2520
>
> Sent mobile
> On Dec 1,
I tried Unity on the desktop for 7 days after the recent UDS and
global menu is terrible for dual monitor setups such as twinview. I
prefer the Chromium/Nautilus Elementary approach of hiding the menus
in a button, unless you are a big big program like Maya.
--
Sent from my Amiga
__
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:34 -0500, Cyril Arnaud wrote:
> I personally think that icon size is perfect as is.
> If some people needs bigger icons, then the icon size should be
> increased through the Universal Access (Large Text option maybe).
I still can't test current shell due to graphics driver
I think that the overview experience might be smoother if you just had
to mouse over the "Windows" and "Applications" areas in the overview to
activate the control instead of clicking on it. In other words, I hover
over "Applications" and I am shown the applications, same for the
"Windows" area
At this point I'm wondering why "Activities" is its own button.
Why not have "Windows" and "Applications" up in the main top bar and eliminate
the need for the "Activities" button (which would have the same effect as
"Windows")
"Windows" would be in the upper left and act just like "Activities"
On 11/30/2010 06:38 AM, Cyril Arnaud wrote:
I agree that Nautilus should be part of the favorites by default
(instead of OOo Writer)
We can easily add it but Alt+F2 "Nautilus" then right click on the
icon in the overview "Add to favorites" is not really intuitive.
I really, really liked the
Not really, the app menu should help avoid this sort of confusion, especially
as
there's a picture of the current focused application just to the left of it,
which the name of the application written to the right of this picture, it
would
make sense to assume something just to the right of thi
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:44 -0700, Sean Brady wrote:
> I really, really liked the breakout of Documents, Music, etc in the
> Shell panel. I had favorites in there for work that I would use
> repeatedly. Perhaps a compromise would be a section next to the
> Windows and Applications buttons in the
a 'normal' user likely won't use dual desktops :-P
From: Bob Hazard
To: Derek Ekins
Cc: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Sent: Tue, 30 November, 2010 18:00:19
Subject: Re: Sujestion
I tried Unity on the desktop for 7 days after the recent UDS and
global menu is ter
Hello,
The volume control in the current version of the Shell is not much of
an improvement from the old one, apart from the aesthetic changes. I
was trying to think of better ways to do this. Now that pulse audio is
quite common, I think it would be beneficial if the functionality that
it offered
And if you have two instances of the same app open?
On 30 November 2010 20:56, Sean Dunwoody wrote:
> Not really, the app menu should help avoid this sort of confusion,
> especially as there's a picture of the current focused application just to
> the left of it, which the name of the applicatio
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:58 +, Sean Dunwoody wrote:
> a 'normal' user likely won't use dual desktops :-P
it's very common these days, particularly since more and more people are
using laptops but have desktop monitors 'left over' - just plug the
desktop monitor into the laptop.
when we run Fe
The new Gnome Shell Window metacity (not sure if this is the right terminology)
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Screenshot-2.png I'm sure
I read a blog post about it too but I can't seem to find it . . .
Regardless if you have two instances of the same app open I don't see
So, this might be a compromise for the folks that want a taskbar while
still maintaining the design principals of the shell: when you hover
your mouse over an application that has more than one window open, the
overview changes and displays all open windows for that application,
regardless of t
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 09:16 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Although I have these errors(chosen option [2]):
>
> Choose [4] Start Shell and type git reset --hard HEAD
>
> That should fix it.
> Regards,
> Johannes
>
Thanks, it works
Cheers,
Allan Registos
_
It is a matter of personal taste. But for me, on a 1366x768 15" monitor,
it doesn't look good, how much more from large monitors.
Anyway, thanks for the new look of the shell and the hardwork!
Cheers,
Allan
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 08:34 -0500, Cyril Arnaud wrote:
> I personally think that icon siz
Hi,
maybe this is an already known idea, but it could be possible to make a
dock with the list of application icons on the left side of overview
mode. When the mouse touches the left edge of the screen, the list of
icons slides in, just like a taskbar, without activating the exposé for
windows. I'd
- Original Message -
From: "Johannes Schmid"
To: "Allan E. Registos"
Cc: "Owen Taylor" , gnome-announce-l...@gnome.org,
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:16:59 PM
Subject: Re: GNOME Shell 2.91.3 released
>Hi!
>> Although I have these errors(chosen opt
- Original Message -
From: "Derek Ekins"
To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 12:38:20 AM
Subject: Re: Sujestion
>-1
>If you have more than one window open at a time having a unified menu bar is
>not very nice.
I think only the "active" window's menu
- Original Message -
From: "Derek Ekins"
To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 12:56:14 AM
Subject: Re: Sujestion
>Y eah but IMO it is hard to associate what window the menu is for
It is so easy by > F ile E dit V iew etc.
On 30 November 2010 16:50, A
+1
This is exactly what I suggested in a very recent discussion about
minimizing windows in gnome-shell.
This is a extremely simple change that adds the much needed* taskbar to
gnome shell.
*See my post in "Minimizing Windows violates mental model" for details.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:29 PM,
+1 to this idea, less mouse gesture, I don't have to go to activities, just a
quick mouse hover to the left edge of the screen.
In addition if there is an accidental mouse hover to the left, the slide-in
effect must be quick enough to avoid distraction while working on a task.
Besides, for th
30 matches
Mail list logo