Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread dE .
Precisely, as I was saying this looks more for an embedded device. So it should take on lower priority as with the netbook interface for KDE... and unlike what gnome is doing now, the KDE team did a great job designing it. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov

Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-853679.html > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57638&start=0 > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1628158 You know that your question is far from neutral I guess and so are the possible answers. And of course it's far from statistically

Drag and drop on launchers

2010-11-23 Thread Andreas Wallberg
Hi all! I keep a few custom launchers around to open various kinds of clear text data files produced by scientific applications, perhaps with some extra scripted pre-processing. The data files do not have any particular file ending or anything else that allows the system to figure out that I want

Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Felipe Erias Morandeira
On 22/11/10 14:39, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:13 +0100, Andreas Wallberg wrote: >> If the users do not seem to "get" a particular design choice, please >> take a few moments to explain them. > > As a user I feel that GNOME 3 has been well explained many, many, > many...

RE: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Mark Curtis
While Unity will be default, Ubuntu users are by no means forced to use it. Subject: Re: Gnome objectives From: j...@jsschmid.de To: de.tec...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:05:20 +0100 CC: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org Hi! > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-853679.html > http://forums.d

Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 06:47 +0530, dE . wrote: > So I ran a poll on this in various communities - > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-853679.html > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57638&start=0 > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1628158 Seems to me the first comment on the

Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Rovanion Luckey
Can this thread be closed? It is in no way constructive and will lead nowhere. -- www.twitter.com/Rovanion ___ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Justin Edwards
Lots of good things have to be learned. Do you use bash and GNU tools? That's like saying the mouse thing will never catch on. Justin Edwards TeleLanguage Inc, Network Administrator On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Felipe Erias Morandeira < femorande...@igalia.com> wrote: > On 22/11/10 14:39

RE: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Mark Curtis
Negative comments shouldn't be summarily dismissed either. > Subject: Re: Gnome objectives > From: awill...@whitemice.org > To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:06:28 -0500 > > On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 06:47 +0530, dE . wrote: > > So I ran a poll on this in various communitie

Re: Gnome objectives

2010-11-23 Thread Sean Dunwoody
There have been a few discussions like this on the mailing list, and most come to a similar conclusion: People want an easier way to switch between windows, and alt+tab isn't a solution as a 'normal' user will likely not know what alt+tab is I honestly don't know what the solution is and I'm no