Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-17 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Thiago Bellini Ribeiro wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Thiago Bellini Ribeiro > wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jasper St. Pierre >> wrote: >>> Note that with Debian/Ubuntu, there's an issue with multiarch >>> conflicting with 64-bit system

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-16 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Thiago Bellini Ribeiro wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jasper St. Pierre > wrote: >> Note that with Debian/Ubuntu, there's an issue with multiarch >> conflicting with 64-bit systems. jhbuild assumes that /usr/lib64/ >> exists on all systems with "x86_64

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-15 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > Note that with Debian/Ubuntu, there's an issue with multiarch > conflicting with 64-bit systems. jhbuild assumes that /usr/lib64/ > exists on all systems with "x86_64" in the uname, but that's untrue > for Debian systems. > > Put "use_lib

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-14 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Note that with Debian/Ubuntu, there's an issue with multiarch conflicting with 64-bit systems. jhbuild assumes that /usr/lib64/ exists on all systems with "x86_64" in the uname, but that's untrue for Debian systems. Put "use_lib64 = False" in your .jhbuildrc as a workaround for this. On Sun, Oct

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-14 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > 2012/10/14 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Giovanni Campagna >> wrote: >>> 2012/10/9 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Ok after digging a bit,

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-14 Thread Giovanni Campagna
2012/10/14 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Giovanni Campagna > wrote: >> 2012/10/9 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : >>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Giovanni Campagna >>> wrote: Ok after digging a bit, the problem is that .acknowledged is only set for notificatio

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-14 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > 2012/10/9 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Giovanni Campagna >> wrote: >>> Ok after digging a bit, the problem is that .acknowledged is only set >>> for notifications that are in the queue, but >>> (notificati

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-14 Thread Giovanni Campagna
2012/10/9 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Giovanni Campagna > wrote: >> Ok after digging a bit, the problem is that .acknowledged is only set >> for notifications that are in the queue, but >> (notificationDaemon.js:564) resident notifications are not queued if >> the o

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-09 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Ok after digging a bit, the problem is that .acknowledged is only set > for notifications that are in the queue, but > (notificationDaemon.js:564) resident notifications are not queued if > the originating app is currently focused. A good

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-06 Thread Giovanni Campagna
2012/10/3 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Giovanni Campagna > wrote: >> It's very possible that there is a bug, as that count is used by the >> screen lock and only for non resident notifications. It would be very >> helpful if you could debug, or otherwise just look at

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-02 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > It's very possible that there is a bug, as that count is used by the > screen lock and only for non resident notifications. It would be very > helpful if you could debug, or otherwise just look at > js/ui/screenShield.js : NotificationBox

Re: source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-10-02 Thread Giovanni Campagna
2012/9/29 Thiago Bellini Ribeiro : > Hi all, > > I'm the developer of Notifications Alert extension[1]. > > I was updating it to work with 3.6, testing it on > ubuntu-gnome-remix[2] that I downloaded today (I'm on Debian Testing > and it will take a long time before I can play with 3.6 here =P). >

source.unseenCount's strange behavior

2012-09-29 Thread Thiago Bellini Ribeiro
Hi all, I'm the developer of Notifications Alert extension[1]. I was updating it to work with 3.6, testing it on ubuntu-gnome-remix[2] that I downloaded today (I'm on Debian Testing and it will take a long time before I can play with 3.6 here =P). On 3.2 and 3.4, what my extension did was: Every