My bad, but the fact remains that minimizing a window will change
nothing in overview.
My point was more that you have to reconsider your workflow instead of
trying to retrieve a feature that's becoming less useful.
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 20:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 22:20 -0400, Cyril Arnaud wrote:
> There is no minimize per say in Gnome Shell (there not even a button
> for this).
Yes, there is. Right-click on the window title, and click minimize.
There is also a dconf setting which can re-enable the minimize button,
and gnome-tweak-tool
There is no minimize per say in Gnome Shell (there not even a button for
this).
Instead of changing the code (mutter or gnome shell) or even creating an
extension, I suggest you simply change your workflow.
Like you I have Evolution on 100% of the time.
I simply put it in another workspace. Usually
Hi,
I wanted to say that I really love GNOME 3, nice work all. :)
One thing I'm missing is a way to get windows out of the way when I don't want
to work with them. For instance, I keep Evolution running 100% of the time but
only check it every now and then. Same with Banshee, it's always running
Unity is not gnome shell. It is an Ubuntu project, and they own they copyright
to all the source code. Gnome shell is the official gnome desktop, which is
much better IMHO. If you don't like that, gnome classic is still available and
supported. This list is for questions and concerns related
On 5/26/2011 5:51 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
(e) there is an extension available [in at least the openSUSE GNOME3
STABLE repo] that adds Suspend& Power Off as discreet items on the
menu.
@Adam:
Perhaps one of your audience is not system admins/power users(users of
tweak* & extensions).
De
r off option should follow current behaviour of asking
>>>>> wether one wants to power off or restart.
>>>>
>>>> OK, let's assume the user gets that distinction clear in their mind.
>>>> Do they then realize that Suspend is a quite r
We all (on this list) know about the extension, I personally have a
key shortcut for powering off. The discussion is about the choice of
hiding the Power Off option and the effect it has on your average
user. The problem is that most people don't look things up, if they
don't know how to do it th
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 19:53 +0200, Philipp Mohrenweiser wrote:
> Dont know if it was mentiond but there is an extention to have all the
> shutdown suspend etc at once...
I was mentioned at least once [by me] and summarily disregarded. Of
course each distro will choose what extensions to package a
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 21:38 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > (This is actually one area where the kernel folks and distros - like us!
> > - seriously need to pull their finger out and either fix up the current
> > hibernate code, or swall
Dont know if it was mentiond but there is an extention to have all the
shutdown suspend etc at once...
Cheers phil
Am 27.05.2011 19:23 schrieb "Diego Fernandez" :
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Martin Häsler
> wrote:
>> On 05/27/11 17:12, Owen Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:53
sorry for double posting forgot to include that in the end it's the
person's choice whether they want to 'waste' the few seconds it takes
to shutdown/bootup or not. The user will look at the value of
shutting down and saving some energy vs. the few seconds they might
have to wait to boot up and ma
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Martin Häsler
wrote:
> On 05/27/11 17:12, Owen Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:53 -0700, Diego Fernandez wrote:
>>
>>> Well then couldn't there just be a 'Power Off' and 'Suspend' option in
>>> the menu then? That doesn't seem too confusing... Suspend
>
>> Please feel free to crunch the numbers, because I've got not idea, what
> you are talking of.
> Also a computer takes < 10 seconds to power off, how is that a lot of time
> ?
>
> And of course it is not reasonable at all to suspend when back in a bit
> means tomorrow.
> That is a waste of ene
On 05/27/11 17:12, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:53 -0700, Diego Fernandez wrote:
Well then couldn't there just be a 'Power Off' and 'Suspend' option in
the menu then? That doesn't seem too confusing... Suspend = "I'll be
back in a bit and want to get back to what I was doing".
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:53 -0700, Diego Fernandez wrote:
> Well then couldn't there just be a 'Power Off' and 'Suspend' option in
> the menu then? That doesn't seem too confusing... Suspend = "I'll be
> back in a bit and want to get back to what I was doing". Power Off =
> "I'm done for a while
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> (This is actually one area where the kernel folks and distros - like us!
> - seriously need to pull their finger out and either fix up the current
> hibernate code, or swallow their pride and merge in either tuxonice or
> uswsusp, like now;
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> The only real cultural mismatch I think exists here is what the right
> response is to do if the user gets confused by a menu that says:
>
> Suspend
> Hibernate
> Power Off
> Restart
>
> Is the right thing to do to provide training for the
The only real cultural mismatch I think exists here is what the right
response is to do if the user gets confused by a menu that says:
Suspend
Hibernate
Power Off
Restart
Is the right thing to do to provide training for the user, or is the
right thing to do to improve the user interface? I'm
The whole argument for not having Power Off as a visible option in the menu
seems to boil down to cultural convention. And I hope everyone here
understands that people do things in different ways in different cultures.
Sometimes people even do things differently than the local convention.
You cann
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:05 +0100, Martin Häsler wrote:
> Am I the only one to think, that the Close button should be on the left
> side?
Wrong. Close button should be on the side user prefers it.
IOW: it should be configurable.
> The insane:
>
> Suspend/Shutdown:
>
> I think this is the first
21 matches
Mail list logo
