Em Dom, 2011-04-10 às 22:36 -0400, Shaun McCance escreveu:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 01:58 +, optio pack wrote:
> > Can someone ask Jason to brush his hair before he shoots a video? He
> > looks like he slept under a bridge in a cardboard box.
>
> I'm certain you can find a more productive use
Even if I think that gnome shell is a good idea,
the problem is with old computers.. where gnome shell
is not available (no 3D in X server), and the "alternative"
desktop is too poor (gnome panel is almost unusable ,
and you cannot put icons in the desktop.
Some of you can even ask why do not
Em Sex, 2011-05-27 às 16:55 +0100, Andrew Wood escreveu:
> I cant understand why so many people seem to hate Gnome 3. I think its
> brilliant. Perfectly logical, clean, simple, easy to understand and
> beautiful looking.
Yes, if you use gnome-shell,
if not (because of the video board...) it is
Em Sex, 2011-06-03 às 20:24 +0200, Cornelia Pfeffer escreveu:
> Hello
>
> Some day ago I downloaded Fedora 15, that contents "gnome 3".
> FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE!
> There's someone among you that wants to make Linux-users run away?? What
> a horrible solution did you invent?!?!?!?
> TERRIBLE!
Ye
Em Sex, 2011-06-10 às 19:07 +0800, Frederic Muller escreveu:
>
> A .0 (as in 3.0) release is not for everybody. Maybe distributions
> currently runs on the 2.x branch while GNOME is ironing out the 3.x
> branch. Apparently you should wait until the next cycle to give it
> another try and see i
Em Sex, 2011-06-10 às 15:03 -0300, Iki Sham escreveu:
> Hi Sergio (namesake, I'm Sérgio too).
>
> Your complaints aren't fair, really. This is a distribution issue, it
> has NOTHING to do with GNOME, which must keep moving.
>
> Regarding the panel and icons:
> http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/04/1
>
> I don't quite understand your point: we have recommended a long list of
> supported distributions which support your preferred version of GNOME
> for the upcoming 6 to 18 months (or more). What else are you looking for?
>
> Or maybe we can be more specific: what distribution were you runn
Em Qua, 2011-06-15 às 09:38 -0400, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak escreveu:
> On 06/15/2011 06:52 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> >
> > Gnome seems to be taking the road of dumbing down and targeting "single
> > tasking" users, leaving multitasking power users with having to move and
> > click the mouse w
Em Qua, 2011-06-15 às 16:35 +0200, Olav Vitters escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:18:05AM -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> > Yes, I agree, power users will "see" the great advantage gnome shell,
> > but for each one
>
> 1. You mentioned you weren'
Em Qua, 2011-06-15 às 17:07 +0200, Cornelia Pfeffer escreveu:
> Dear Olav, I think you get this wrong. Sergio is not speaking on other
> peoples behalf saying something wrong. You know like myself that he is
> right for the bigger part of users.
THANK YOU Cornelia, You said it all
Sergi
> So yes it is some work, but innovating in free software and on the
> desktop is as well. While we (free software developers) tend to be
> labeled as copycats for once there is a project that dares to try new
> ways of doing things. I think it is very good for free software (my
> personal op
Em Qua, 2011-08-10 às 08:56 +0200, Magnus Therning escreveu:
> For me it took a good 2 months of
> daily use to get used to it, and still I'm not quite sure whether I
> like it or not. As has been pointed out before there is a very real
> loss of configurability that is easy to access, but hopeful
Ok I know that gnome3 will be the stunning desktop user
for all, but for now, seems that the change from gnome2 is too
fast for the users... and forgot about the old gnome panel...
that does not work in "compatible" mode, the same way it used
to do. For me, I installed new users with Xfce..
and
Em Sex, 2011-08-12 às 14:20 -0400, Mike Williams escreveu:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:49:49PM -0600, Dennis J Perkins
> wrote:
> > I agree. Too many things are missing. And why require
> accelerated
>
> Clearly, the smart man's reaction to GNOME 3. I wish everyone thought that
> way.
>
> IMO, if there is something wrong with the whole GNOME 3 thing
> it is that most distributions dropped GNOME 2 as an option - if the user
> wants a classic PC interface, he should have it.
I think the same wa
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 06:15 +0100, Jan Mussche escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I have joined this mailing list since I feel I have to get in close
> contact to the people who have taken away all the fun in computing.
> After having used Linux with great joy for several years, I am now
> very disappointed.
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 09:16 +0100, Jan Mussche escreveu:
> I'm happy I am not the only one here complaining about the new Gnome.
> Now it will depend on the developers there what will happen with the
> future of Gnome and maybe even Linux in general.
> When even the Man himself, Mr. Linux said tha
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 18:51 +1030, Daniel Moore escreveu:
> Please, Gnome != Linux
>
> Gnome is just one option for Linux out of many. Have a look at the
> alternatives... try some. Linux has always been about finding the
> right package for you, not about ensuring that the general direction
> or
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 09:30 +0100, x y escreveu:
> I have to argue against the previous writers:
>
> I was no gnome2 User and moved to gnome3 because I like the concept.
>
> And: Linux Mint will definitely move to gnome3 but they're working on
> extensions to change panel behaviour and in genera
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 21:57 +0800, Frederic Muller escreveu:
> Those 2 problems are very easily solved in GNOME3
>
> On 11/11/2011 09:30 PM, carpetna...@researchintegration.org wrote:
> open
> > documents that I use everyday or so by just clicking on the desktop
> > icon, I now have to
>
> Ico
> > ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
> > 200 desktops that are unable to display 3D???
> >
>
> They will either go to fallback mode, or (if you wait for 3.4, at
> least i beieve it is planned) 3dhw is not mandatory anymore.
>
WOW... finally a good news... now jus
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 10:18 -0500, Brian J. Murrell escreveu:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:15 -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> > WOW... finally a good news... now just wait for a working panel (a one
> > I can
> > customize...) ...
>
> And desktop and window sel
Em Qua, 2011-11-09 às 22:38 +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff escreveu:
> Hello!
>
> As everyone might have noticed, the ftp:// links aren't supported in
> Epiphany. Is there any way to set an external URI handler for them
> either in Epiphany or in GNOME? Does GNOME infrastructure have the URI
> handle
Em Ter, 2011-11-15 às 14:03 +0100, Dmitrij Czarkoff escreveu:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> wrote:
> > Arch linux had a patch (I do not use arch linux any more...)
> > that fix the ftp:// in gnome
> >
> > Go to the archlinux site (
Em Ter, 2011-11-15 às 12:47 +0200, Simos Xenitellis escreveu:
>
> If you want to get to more precise statistics, have a look at
> http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportOperatingSystems.htm
> which tells a different story.
>
> It makes sense to install the latest version of your
Em Seg, 2011-11-28 às 18:32 +0100, Magnus Therning escreveu:
> I'm about to leave all the Gnome mailing lists, but I thought I'd
> leave a short thank-you note first in an attempt to explain why I, who
> has used Gnome for the last 5+ years, have decided to jump ship.
Thank you so much, for the i
> up the Gnome2 :)
>
> Sorry, GNOME 2 is done, dead, and buried.
>
NOT so fast
I rebuild gnome2 with kernel 3.9 kms, systemd, wicd, applets... gtk3,
libreoffice 4.0.3, gvfs... the same port
that FreeBSD 9.1 uses (and it works very well, I am wirtting
this from the gnome interface..
this
Em Sex, 2013-05-17 às 19:14 -0600, Marcus Rhodes escreveu:
> Well, I've had about enough.
>
> Who is Adam Tauno Williams, and for whom does he speak? Not me. And
> clearly not most of you,
not me either
> as the looming failures of Metro, Unity, and Gnome3 (not to mention
> KDE's equally usel
Em Sáb, 2013-05-18 às 18:31 -0500, Jared Jennings escreveu:
> ** This isn't a rant or a rave** :)
>
>
> We love progress, we love old, we love familiar, we love new. We
> support Free Software and the accompanying options. It's all about
> *free* as in liberating. I know several of us have been
Em Sáb, 2013-05-18 às 16:44 -0600, Marcus Rhodes escreveu:
> Thank you, Sergio.
>
> "That is why I rebuild gnome2.32 from scratch using an archlinux
> distribution (642 modules compilled over a 45 days, with the help of
> the FreeBSD ports)
> and gnome2.32 is back running in kernel 3.9 with syste
30 matches
Mail list logo
