On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 00:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> No replies?
>
> Not from users, nor developers. Something is definitely wrong here.
Something is wrong because nobody responded to a barrage of emails
within three hours? I'm a developer. I don't get paid to do this.
> On Fri, 2011-11-11
Try LXDE. gtk3 based but GNOME2 like. works well for me.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> No replies?
>
> Not from users, nor developers. Something is definitely wrong here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 a
No replies?
Not from users, nor developers. Something is definitely wrong here.
Thanks!
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:48 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:43 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:48 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:43 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:31 +0100, x y wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> ok... but if you do not have the gnomes
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 21:43 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:31 +0100, x y wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
> > >> 200 desktops that are unable to displ
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:31 +0100, x y wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> wrote:
> >
> >> ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
> >> 200 desktops that are unable to display 3D???
Where is the netspeed applet? And why does pidgin not work
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 10:18 -0500, Brian J. Murrell escreveu:
> On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:15 -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> > WOW... finally a good news... now just wait for a working panel (a one
> > I can
> > customize...) ...
>
> And desktop and window selection that only requires a si
The hot corner is your friend:
"The hot corner is the corner at the top left of the screen. When you
move the pointer to this corner, the activities overview opens."
I do not know whether the problem is in Fedora 15 or in Gnome 3 -- but
for me the activities overview opens unexpectedly (several
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
wrote:
>
>> ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
>> 200 desktops that are unable to display 3D???
>>
>
> They will either go to fallback mode, or (if you wait for 3.4, at
> least i beieve it is planned) 3dhw is not
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:15 -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> WOW... finally a good news... now just wait for a working panel (a one
> I can
> customize...) ...
And desktop and window selection that only requires a single click (or
two at most) of a mouse rather than multiple clicks and/or h
Hello!
As everyone might have noticed, the ftp:// links aren't supported in
Epiphany. Is there any way to set an external URI handler for them
either in Epiphany or in GNOME? Does GNOME infrastructure have the URI
handler settings? Does Epiphany support it?
P.S.: Sorry for cross-posting, I don't
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:30:41 -0500
> From: "carpetna...@researchintegration.org"
>
[...]
> Another: I used to be able to move to a different app/document by
> clicking on the document in the bottom panel Now I have to
> 1. Alt-tab to get the screen that has the different apps
> 2. Conti
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:19:19 -0200
> From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
[...]
> ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
> 200 desktops that are unable to display 3D???
>
> I bought several (20) diskless stations Intel Atom N525.. and linux
> is unable to start the 3D in
> > ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
> > 200 desktops that are unable to display 3D???
> >
>
> They will either go to fallback mode, or (if you wait for 3.4, at
> least i beieve it is planned) 3dhw is not mandatory anymore.
>
WOW... finally a good news... now jus
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
wrote:
> Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 21:57 +0800, Frederic Muller escreveu:
>
> Those 2 problems are very easily solved in GNOME3
>
> On 11/11/2011 09:30 PM, carpetna...@researchintegration.org wrote:
> open
>> documents that I use everyday or s
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:19:19PM -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> ok... but if you do not have the gnomeshell?? what about those
> 200 desktops that are unable to display 3D???
>
> I bought several (20) diskless stations Intel Atom N525.. and linux
> is unable to start the 3D in the c
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:30 PM, carpetna...@researchintegration.org
wrote:
> Think of all the time wasted by the (hundreds of thousands of?) users
> all over the world trying to relearn how to use their major, everyday
> tool! Steve Jobs reportedly reminded his developers early on something
> lik
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:16:49PM +0100, Trond Husø wrote:
> I am still on 10.04 LTS (Ubuntu), and so I am still on Gnome2 waiting
> for the next LTS to arrive which will either have G3 or Unity GUI.
Default will be Unity. The GNOME 3 bits are a combination of GNOME 3.0
(totem), 3.2 (evolution,
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 21:57 +0800, Frederic Muller escreveu:
> Those 2 problems are very easily solved in GNOME3
>
> On 11/11/2011 09:30 PM, carpetna...@researchintegration.org wrote:
> open
> > documents that I use everyday or so by just clicking on the desktop
> > icon, I now have to
>
> Ico
Could it be that Gnome 3 GUI is different than any other GUI that we've
seen and worked with.
When Microsoft sent out Windows vista there were some changes from XP,
but not that big. Win7 was more or less vista and since the layout of
the gui was similar to XP and Vista, adopting to Win7 was a bree
Those 2 problems are very easily solved in GNOME3
On 11/11/2011 09:30 PM, carpetna...@researchintegration.org wrote:
open
documents that I use everyday or so by just clicking on the desktop
icon, I now have to
Icons on desktop can be enabled in GNOME3.
This is not progress.
Another: I use
Think of all the time wasted by the (hundreds of thousands of?) users
all over the world trying to relearn how to use their major, everyday
tool! Steve Jobs reportedly reminded his developers early on something
like this: If it takes 10 extra seconds to boot Mac, multiply that by
the millions or us
I have been using gnome shell since the first release on fedora 15. I am
already adapted to almost all changes, but I think some points need more
atention.
The number of mouse clicks, mouse gestures and keyboard key presses were
increased in almost every simple action, like launch an application,
I have been using gnome shell since the first release on fedora 15. I am
already adapted to almost all changes, but I think some points need more
atention.
The number of mouse clicks, mouse gestures and keyboard key presses were
increased in almost every simple action, like launch an application,
I see no lack of functionality or productivity with GNOME 3 compared to
GNOME 2. Many things have to be done in a different way, perhaps too
many for anyone who is already busy with his work, but when you get used
to it, the result is efficiency and comfort.
Really miss some pieces, like a place o
Exactly the same thing happen when kde4 was released. A lot of people angry
left kde or keep using the 3.5 version because kde4 "was a mess".
I think that Gnome 3 need some time to grow. It's just to new. May by in
the next release we will see some of the lost features we have in the 2.x
versions.
You only want to launch flameware not discuss about gnome 3.
Force of open source is choice, so if we are unhappy with something we can
easily switch to another. I am only gnome user not gnome developper.
And yes linux is not gnome, i am surprised a bsd user misunderstand this.
Jan Mussche a é
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:19:02AM +0100, Jan Mussche wrote:
> Question: what is this mailing list for, if not for writing about your
> ideas of having a much better Gnome than what we have to deal with now?
As per the description:
"This list is for general discussion of GNOME. It is an appropriat
Question: what is this mailing list for, if not for writing about your
ideas of having a much better Gnome than what we have to deal with now?
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 10:43 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:31:07AM +0100, Jan Mussche wrote:
> > I just had major neck surgery bu
Jan has my sympathy. I joined this list shortly before the change and
was truly appalled when Gnome 3 was imposed on me. I thought I was
upgrading Fedora and was faced with a new and incomprehensible desktop,
which felt like everything I was trying to get away from on Windows and
MACs. I think
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 09:30 +0100, x y escreveu:
> I have to argue against the previous writers:
>
> I was no gnome2 User and moved to gnome3 because I like the concept.
>
> And: Linux Mint will definitely move to gnome3 but they're working on
> extensions to change panel behaviour and in genera
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:31:07AM +0100, Jan Mussche wrote:
> I just had major neck surgery but I don't like to have knife on my
> throat.
I know you're upset, but take such comparisons elsewhere please. Not
appropriate for a public mailing list.
--
Regards,
Olav (moderator)
___
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 06:15 +0100, Jan Mussche wrote:
> Hello,
> If you want people to keep using Gnome you simply have to change back
> to what Gnome was. If not you will see a large decrease of people
> hanging on to it and I can not say it in a different way: this is what
> you deserve.
+1
I
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Jan Mussche wrote:
> Let's face it, Gnome was on 75% of all Linux computers and now the
Any proof for that? Because I don't believe it.
Or any of the other "facts" you're writing about. The only thing I see
are personal feelings written down as "facts".
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 18:51 +1030, Daniel Moore escreveu:
> Please, Gnome != Linux
>
> Gnome is just one option for Linux out of many. Have a look at the
> alternatives... try some. Linux has always been about finding the
> right package for you, not about ensuring that the general direction
> or
Em Sex, 2011-11-11 às 09:16 +0100, Jan Mussche escreveu:
> I'm happy I am not the only one here complaining about the new Gnome.
> Now it will depend on the developers there what will happen with the
> future of Gnome and maybe even Linux in general.
> When even the Man himself, Mr. Linux said tha
Yes, yes, I know that. But I have tried LXDE, XFCE and KDE and why?
Because Gnome stops being Gnome.
Let's face it, Gnome was on 75% of all Linux computers and now the
developers just force us to choose something else or accept what they
have invented.
I just had major neck surgery but I don't lik
I have to argue against the previous writers:
I was no gnome2 User and moved to gnome3 because I like the concept.
And: Linux Mint will definitely move to gnome3 but they're working on
extensions to change panel behaviour and in general immitate the
look&feel of gnome2.
__
Please, Gnome != Linux
Gnome is just one option for Linux out of many. Have a look at the
alternatives... try some. Linux has always been about finding the right package
for you, not about ensuring that the general direction or distribution conforms
to your desires.
On 11/11/2011, at 6:46 PM,
I'm happy I am not the only one here complaining about the new Gnome.
Now it will depend on the developers there what will happen with the
future of Gnome and maybe even Linux in general.
When even the Man himself, Mr. Linux said that Gnome 3 is an unholy mess
and developers have their heads in the
40 matches
Mail list logo
