2008-02-05 klockan 08:54 skrev Danilo Šegan:
> "Social" as in involving people and communication, versus "technical"
> problem (since it's completely possible to restrict access to any of
> the languages in Ubuntu to whoever you wish). There is no way we
> could have fixed the problem without peop
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:54:52AM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Yesterday at 20:22, Djihed Afifi wrote:
>
> > +1 from me for Khaled Hosny to get launchpad team coordinatorship. He
> > sent an email earlier.
>
> I've emailed current coordinator so I am waiting for response.
>
> >> Solving social
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:14:30PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> On January 25th, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
>
> > Yeah it was done by filtering svn-commit-lists. And yeah I certainly
> > understand that it is a bad idea if many people do it, which is why I think
> > it is a good idea if it is done on
hi,
actually it's a fault from both gnome-keyring and DL
if you ran intltool-update -m in the po subdirectory of gnome-keyring
you will see that there's missing files in POTFILES.in
dunno why DL didn't show this error in the pages :-/
so, yes, file a bug
cheers,
El dt 05 de 02 del 2008 a les
Hi Olav,
Today at 10:03, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:54:52AM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
>> Yesterday at 20:22, Djihed Afifi wrote:
>>
>> > +1 from me for Khaled Hosny to get launchpad team coordinatorship. He
>> > sent an email earlier.
>>
>> I've emailed current coordinato
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:50:17PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> >> > I hope that you don't mean that this is a social problem.
> >>
> >> "Social" as in involving people and communication, versus "technical"
> >> problem (since it's completely possible to restrict access to any of
> >> the language
Today at 9:41, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:14:30PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
>> On January 25th, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> > Yeah it was done by filtering svn-commit-lists. And yeah I certainly
>> > understand that it is a bad idea if many people do it, which is why I thi
> Ubuntu provides changes to the base GNOME. They need to be updated as
> well. At the moment, Launchpad can't separate these two, and it will
> take quite some technical effort (read: design, coding, testing,
> fixing) to achieve that separation. Until that happens (let's call
> that 'the corre
Hi,
> > If some language doesn't want Ubuntu to change their strings (especially
> > as they have real evidence that the quality decreases), then this advice
> > should be followed.
>
> Now, we've seen requests coming from GNOME and KDE asking for this.
> They are not representatives of a language
Hi Wouter,
Today at 9:24, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2008-02-05 klockan 08:54 skrev Danilo Šegan:
>> "Social" as in involving people and communication, versus "technical"
>> problem (since it's completely possible to restrict access to any of
>> the languages in Ubuntu to whoever you wish). Ther
Well, but it's branched now. :)
I just made the gnome-2-20 branch for evolution-webcal.
-- dobey
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 15:56 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2008-02-05 klockan 15:38 skrev Dan Winship:
> > I don't maintain evolution-webcal, I just happen to have made the last
> > commit to it.
thanks,
DL updated in rev. 732
cheers,
El dt 05 de 02 del 2008 a les 10:02 -0500, en/na Rodney Dawes va
escriure:
> Well, but it's branched now. :)
>
> I just made the gnome-2-20 branch for evolution-webcal.
>
> -- dobey
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 15:56 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> > 2
Hi Olav,
Today at 15:44, Olav Vitters wrote:
>> Maybe I've should not have used the word 'social'. I tried to
>> contrast it with 'technical' above, hoping that would clarify it.
>>
>> Btw, Planet GNOME is not an efficient communication/collaboration
>> mechanism.
>
> I know. However, it was ra
Today at 16:11, Jorge González wrote:
> Even if you don't provide categorization for GNOME/KDE/WHATEVER, could
> you lock some modules, let's say the ones
> in GNOME svn? and would you be willing to do it?
No. Launchpad has no knowledge of GNOME svn in relation with the
packages in Ubuntu, *and*
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:54:56PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Today at 9:41, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:14:30PM +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> >> On January 25th, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yeah it was done by filtering svn-commit-lists. And yeah I certainly
> >>
Hi!
I fixed http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503526 which
introduces some new fuzzy strings in gnome-build.
Regards,
Johannes
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@
Can somebody change information at this page
http://l10n.gnome.org/teams/
Email change to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and remove http://gabai.sf.net since it dont exist anymore.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/list
17 matches
Mail list logo
