Two more fixes for Locations.xml.in

2005-02-07 Thread Jordi Mallach
I'd like to commit the next two changes to Locations.in. The first one changes the airportname to what appears to be the official name according to the webpage. The second adds the Airport name to València (my previous patch just said Airport, but that was accidentally reverted). I know we're a f

Re: Re[2]: Weekly translation status for Gnome 2.10

2005-02-07 Thread Christian Rose
lör 2005-02-05 klockan 20:59 +0800 skrev Funda Wang: > > Anyone has the time to look into it (look for yellow bars in languages > > which have few translations on status pages)? > > I've just modified translation-status.xml, evolution series including > gal should be fine now. Of course, when the n

Re: Don't commit without permission

2005-02-07 Thread Christian Rose
mån 2005-02-07 klockan 09:26 +0200 skrev Tommi Vainikainen: > Of course now I see that I wasn't careful enough as you see from that > bug. But also with this kind of commit policy helping other > translators is not just possible (asking permission for such trivial > changes is more work than just

Re: Final 2.10 Modules List Proposal

2005-02-07 Thread Christian Rose
mån 2005-02-07 klockan 12:25 +0100 skrev Murray Cumming: > On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 21:51 +0100, Christian Rose wrote: > > fre 2005-02-04 klockan 09:09 +1100 skrev Jeff Waugh: > > > Morning all, > > > > > > The release team has agreed on a final modules list proposal, if there is > > > anything we ha

glibc locale data and Mozilla, Evolution

2005-02-07 Thread Peter Nugent
Hi can anyone confirm (or deny) that Mozilla and Evolution take their locale data (such as date and time formats) from glibc ? >From a quick trawl this would appear to be the case. thanks Peter ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://ma

New strings in GtkSourceView

2005-02-07 Thread Paolo Maggi
While fixing bug #126589, just before the string freeze, I have added 4 strings to GtkSourceView. Actually the same strings already exist in another file so I don't know if this counts as a string change. Ciao, Paolo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

small string in gedit

2005-02-07 Thread Paolo Borelli
Hi, I just added a small string in gedit as part of a bugfix: in the savecopy plugin the suggedted name should sometimes be "%s (copy)" where %s is a filename. I also added a translator comment explaining that %s is a filename. Thanks Paolo ___

Re: glibc locale data and Mozilla, Evolution

2005-02-07 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 15:49, Peter Nugent wrote: > Hi > can anyone confirm (or deny) that Mozilla and Evolution take their > locale data (such as date and time formats) from glibc ? >>From a quick trawl this would appear to be the case. I don't know about Mozilla (but listing a directory on my hard drive seem

Re: New strings in GtkSourceView

2005-02-07 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 18:21, Paolo Maggi wrote: > Actually the same strings already exist in another file so I don't know if > this counts as a string change. These are string changes, but as Christian Rose explained in a mail about the freeze, these don't count as string freeze breakages. Cheers, Danilo __

gok string changes: 3 new/modified strings

2005-02-07 Thread Bill Haneman
Hi: As part of the 'string freeze day' GOK release, we have modified/added four strings. They are long-ish, sorry, but three of the four are similar to a previous string in the GOK "core pointer warning" dialog. We haven't run intltool-update on the release, so the strings aren't included in t

Re: gok string changes: 3 new/modified strings

2005-02-07 Thread Bill Haneman
Bill Haneman wrote: THE STRING BELOW HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM CVS BUT IT IS STILL IN THE 0.12.2 DIST: sorry about the extraneous newlines. ... I did a re-dist, gok-0.12.3 has been released. It contains the final versions of all strings, and removes the deprecated string above. Thanks, that should

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Schema file issues

2005-02-07 Thread JP Rosevear
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:00 +0100, Danilo Åegan wrote: > Hi, > > Today at 18:27, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > So, my original task morphed somewhat and I ended up tidying up the > > contacts, calendar and shell schema files (and cropped up some > > additional issues below), I started on the mailer b

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Schema file issues

2005-02-07 Thread JP Rosevear
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:00 +0100, Danilo Åegan wrote: > Hi, > > Today at 18:27, JP Rosevear wrote: > > > So, my original task morphed somewhat and I ended up tidying up the > > contacts, calendar and shell schema files (and cropped up some > > additional issues below), I started on the mailer b

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Schema file issues

2005-02-07 Thread Not Zed
Well you asked for an opinion. On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which > shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working > properly. Well,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Schema file issues

2005-02-07 Thread Not Zed
Well you asked for an opinion. On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which > shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working > properly. Well,