On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Today at 2:38, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> > Vte has been branched for GNOME 2.14. The branch name is
> > vte-0.12
>
> Thanks for the notice. The branch name seems to actually be
> "vte-0-12", but is there any reason you didn't use "gnome-2-14" as is
> c
Today at 2:38, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Vte has been branched for GNOME 2.14. The branch name is
> vte-0.12
Thanks for the notice. The branch name seems to actually be
"vte-0-12", but is there any reason you didn't use "gnome-2-14" as is
common for most modules (except glib and gtk+)?
Also, th
Hi again :)
On 31/03/2006, at 3:58 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Vte has been branched for GNOME 2.14. The branch name is
vte-0.12
Behdad, this means vte will have its own separate branch, outside the
gnome-2-14 directory, is that right?
I'm not sure what you exactly mean by gnome-2-14 direc
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Clytie Siddall wrote:
>
> On 31/03/2006, at 11:08 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> > Vte has been branched for GNOME 2.14. The branch name is
> > vte-0.12
>
> Behdad, this means vte will have its own separate branch, outside the
> gnome-2-14 directory, is that right?
I'm not s
On 31/03/2006, at 11:08 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Vte has been branched for GNOME 2.14. The branch name is
vte-0.12
Behdad, this means vte will have its own separate branch, outside the
gnome-2-14 directory, is that right?
This is more difficult to do, and to remember. Is it really nece
Hi,
Vte has been branched for GNOME 2.14. The branch name is
vte-0.12
--behdad
http://behdad.org/
"Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill"
-- Dan Bern, "New American Language"
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-
