On 2/27/07, Simos Xenitellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 00:39 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> > I can recall in some older discussion that current GNOME 'policy' is
> > "source code == en_US".
I used to think "source code == C (locale)"
>
> I think that should be "source code
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 00:39 +0800, Abel Cheung wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
> > > marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
> > > a lot of unambiguous characters fo
On 2/27/07, Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
> > marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
> > a lot of unambiguous characters for situations like that, and many
> > people (ex. web standards
"Leonardo Fontenelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
> marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
> a lot of unambiguous characters for situations like that, and many
> people (ex. web standards people) thi
The ellipses at least is in virtually every Latin font. Since the glyph
for this character is in the "Windows ANSI" character set, the
"Macintosh Roman" character set and the old "Adobe Standard Encoding" it
is safe to use even with old fonts that have < 256 glyphs, provided the
font is correc
2007-02-27 klockan 02:58 skrev Leonardo Fontenelle:
> Recently I talked to the rest of the pt_BR l10n team and we decided not to
> use this "nice and hard" unicode chars.
Other l10n teams may adopt different policies. For instance, the nl_NL team
uses ‘fancy quotes’ instead of 'straight quotes'.
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:07 +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Leonardo Fontenelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
> > marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
> > a lot of unambiguous charac
On 2/27/07, Leonardo Fontenelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
> marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
> a lot of unambiguous characters for situations like that, and many
> people (ex. web standards peo
Sorry, forgot to identify myself.
Leonardo Fontenelle (leonardof)
2007/2/26, Leonardo Fontenelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
> marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
> a lot of unambiguous characters for s
Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
a lot of unambiguous characters for situations like that, and many
people (ex. web standards people) think you should use them as often
as possible. I kind of agre
2007/2/21, Wouter Bolsterlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007-02-19 klockan 09:21 skrev Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy:
> > I found glade3 is using three-dot symbols "…" instead of thee dots
> > "...". If I recall correctly, we're all in favor of ascii symbols. Is
> > it okay using non-ascii symbols?
>
> I genera
On Wednesday at 15:36, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2007-02-19 klockan 09:21 skrev Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy:
>> I found glade3 is using three-dot symbols "…" instead of thee dots
>> "...". If I recall correctly, we're all in favor of ascii symbols. Is
>> it okay using non-ascii symbols?
>
> I generally
2007-02-19 klockan 09:21 skrev Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy:
> I found glade3 is using three-dot symbols "…" instead of thee dots
> "...". If I recall correctly, we're all in favor of ascii symbols. Is
> it okay using non-ascii symbols?
I generally consider input to be in UTF-8, not ASCII. Gnome is fully
Hi,
I found glade3 is using three-dot symbols "…" instead of thee dots
"...". If I recall correctly, we're all in favor of ascii symbols. Is
it okay using non-ascii symbols?
--
Duy
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
