On 1/3/07, Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today at 10:07, Woodman wrote:
> > zh_TW "Chinese (Taiwan)" team is missing on progress.gnome.org
> > Please fix it!
>
> Since it seems to be a single "Chinese (Traditional)" team managing
> both Chinese (Hong Kong) and Chinese (Taiwan) translati
Today at 10:07, Woodman wrote:
> zh_TW "Chinese (Taiwan)" team is missing on progress.gnome.org
> Please fix it!
Since it seems to be a single "Chinese (Traditional)" team managing
both Chinese (Hong Kong) and Chinese (Taiwan) translations, I've set
it up as this.
http://progress.gnome.org/tea
Hi,
zh_TW "Chinese (Taiwan)" team is missing on progress.gnome.org
Please fix it!
thanks,
Woodman
On 1/2/07, Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yesterday at 14:46, Djihed Afifi wrote:
> There are some differences between the branching details of some
> packages for gnome-2-16. Is p.g.
Yesterday at 14:46, Djihed Afifi wrote:
> There are some differences between the branching details of some
> packages for gnome-2-16. Is p.g.o not up to date or has there been some
> changes?
Updated now. I am currently doing the first FULL run of progress.g.o
code on SVN repository. I will lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Djihed Afifi escribió:
> There are some differences between the branching details of some
> packages for gnome-2-16. Is p.g.o not up to date or has there been some
> changes?
>
Danilo is the one that can answer your question.
He's working hard on
There are some differences between the branching details of some
packages for gnome-2-16. Is p.g.o not up to date or has there been some
changes?
Djihed
Example:
http://progress.gnome.org/languages/ar/gnome-2-16
http://l10n-status.gnome.org/gnome-2.16/ar/desktop/index.html
(alacarte, bug-buddy,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As most of you already know, the website at progress.gnome.org has been
designed to substitute l10n-status.gnome.org.
Today, the migration to Subversion ended so no new commits will be done
at cvs.gnome.org and thus, l10n-status.gnome.org will no
