O/H Jorge González González έγραψε:
>> 3) The abbreviations will never be widely used or known if nobody takes
>> the initiative to use them.
> We have been using them at the the Spanish GTP at least since I joined, in
> 2004.
Also, the Fedora Documentation Project uses them consistently.
-d
-
> 3) The abbreviations will never be widely used or known if nobody takes
> the initiative to use them.
We have been using them at the the Spanish GTP at least since I joined, in 2004.
--
Jorge González González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Weblog: http://aloriel.no-ip.org
Fotolog: http://www.flickr.com/ph
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 14:46 -0400, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:34 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> >
> > > You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> > > As I translator, I have sta
Sven Neumann skrev:
> Since when do the translators do such decisions on their own? The only
> reasonable thing to do at this point is to bring up the question on
> desktop-devel-list and wait for a decision.
You are totally correct.
If we are going to use IEEE 1541, that should be on a global s
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:28 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> So if gnome-vfs is not going to be fix, you can :
> - fix each program (that's what i did
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-system-monitor/branches/gnome-2-14/src/util.c?r1=1159&r2=1205
> )
I would even rate that patch as wrong. U
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:28 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> I'm totally for it.
>
> They were bugs against gnome-vfs but they were closed WONTFIX IIRC.
>
> So if gnome-vfs is not going to be fix, you can :
> - fix each program (that's what i did
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-system-mon
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 18:30 +0200, Sven Neumann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301838
--
Benoît D
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 18:30 +0200, Sven Neumann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
>
> > I was thinking about bug reporting all applications tha
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit :
> I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
> convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate KiB, MiB, GiB
> etc.
>
> What do you think
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:34 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
>
> > You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> > As I translator, I have started to notice that more and more
> > applications start to use this new co
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> As I translator, I have started to notice that more and more
> applications start to use this new convention. For the beginning I was a
> bit negative but started to lik
Sven Neumann skrev:
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
No, since I was just guessing.
> Might be more correct, but I don't think it would be more appropriate.
> While kB, MB and GB are common and well-known abbreviations, KiB, MiB,
> GiB and the like are not widely used and would c
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
Could you please point me to this discussion?
> I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
> convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate K
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit :
> I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
> convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate KiB, MiB, GiB
> etc.
>
> What do you think
I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate KiB, MiB, GiB
etc.
What do you think about that?
--
Daniel Nylander (CISSP, GCUX, GCFA)
http://www.DanielNylander
15 matches
Mail list logo
