thanks for the info
2009/3/16 Petr Kovar :
> Hi!
>
> It seems like gnome-netstatus was branched for 2.26 several days ago, but
> there has been no notice to translators (gnome-i18n@gnome.org) as far as
> I know. See:
>
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-netstatus/branches/gnome-2-26/
>
> Diego, p
On 3/16/09, Petr Kovar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems like gnome-netstatus was branched for 2.26 several days ago, but
> there has been no notice to translators (gnome-i18n@gnome.org) as far as
> I know. See:
>
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-netstatus/branches/gnome-2-26/
>
> Diego, please co
Hi!
It seems like gnome-netstatus was branched for 2.26 several days ago, but
there has been no notice to translators (gnome-i18n@gnome.org) as far as
I know. See:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-netstatus/branches/gnome-2-26/
Diego, please consider sending a notice to the i18n mailing list ne
Le jeudi 27 novembre 2008 à 15:59 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> the mysteries of life and destiny took me to give some love to
> gnome-netstatus yesterday, this is to let you know that I branched it
> (although late, Claude reminded me...) so new stuff can get into
> trunk.
Th
Hi,
the mysteries of life and destiny took me to give some love to
gnome-netstatus yesterday, this is to let you know that I branched it
(although late, Claude reminded me...) so new stuff can get into
trunk.
Feel free to drop by and post a patch or update an old one, code
hasn't changed much sin
Yesterday at 15:39, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> GNOME 2.10.x development is now on the gnome-2-10 branch of
> gnome-netstatus.
Thanks for the notice Mark, translation status pages should show the
new branch next time they update.
Cheers,
Danilo
___
Hi,
GNOME 2.10.x development is now on the gnome-2-10 branch of
gnome-netstatus.
Cheers,
Mark.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
