Re: ggv has been branched

2005-06-08 Thread Christian Rose
tis 2005-06-07 klockan 18:50 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker: > > I'm afraid the current branch name will be very confusing to many > > contributors, not at least translators, who work with many modules at > > the same time and rely on branches being named consistently. > > Understood. > > > > The policy (

Re: ggv has been branched

2005-06-07 Thread Gary Ekker
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 00:40 +0200, Christian Rose wrote: > I'm afraid the current branch name will be very confusing to many > contributors, not at least translators, who work with many modules at > the same time and rely on branches being named consistently. > Understood. > The policy (http://d

Re: ggv has been branched

2005-06-07 Thread Christian Rose
tis 2005-06-07 klockan 16:06 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker: > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Rose wrote: > > mån 2005-06-06 klockan 20:44 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The stable branch is now gnome-2-8¸ development branch is HEAD with a > > > version bump to 2.11.0. > >

Re: ggv has been branched

2005-06-07 Thread Gary Ekker
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Rose wrote: > mån 2005-06-06 klockan 20:44 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker: > > Hi, > > > > The stable branch is now gnome-2-8¸ development branch is HEAD with a > > version bump to 2.11.0. > > I'm confused -- is this stable branch intended as being the sta

ggv has been branched

2005-06-07 Thread Gary Ekker
Hi, The stable branch is now gnome-2-8¸ development branch is HEAD with a version bump to 2.11.0. Cheers. -Gary ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n