Re: bug-buddy was branched silently some time ago

2006-12-04 Thread Davyd Madeley
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:14 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > if every gnome bugzilla product has a boolean value providing its > maintenance state, we can also tell the user that he/she should not > expect fixes, as that product is currently unmaintained. Perhaps we could do something like calculate

Re: bug-buddy was branched silently some time ago

2006-11-29 Thread Olav Vitters
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:14:20PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > we should also take care of i18n here by having bug-buddy submit the > user's LANG setting, so the feedback language could be > adjusted/translated. There is no usable infrastructure on the server to translate something. -- Regards

Re: bug-buddy was branched silently some time ago

2006-11-28 Thread Andre Klapper
[also CC'ing the bugsquad] hi fernando, Am Dienstag, den 28.11.2006, 02:51 +0200 schrieb Fernando Herrera: > So the hot question: what's expected on 2.17 regarding bug-buddy?. > > 1) Some polishing of the new UI > 2) When no debug symbols are present, dump the crash information into > a minidump

Re: bug-buddy was branched silently some time ago

2006-11-28 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2006-11-28 klockan 01:51 skrev Fernando Herrera: > I branched bug-buddy silently some days ago. I cannot remember if my > plan was mailing d-d-l and friends in the next morning, but I > completely forgot about it. I've updated the jhbuild moduleset and the translation status pages. mvrgr, Woute

bug-buddy was branched silently some time ago

2006-11-27 Thread Fernando Herrera
Hi, I branched bug-buddy silently some days ago. I cannot remember if my plan was mailing d-d-l and friends in the next morning, but I completely forgot about it. So the hot question: what's expected on 2.17 regarding bug-buddy?. 1) Some polishing of the new UI 2) When no debug symbols are prese