F Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Another thing we perhaps could use the compendium for is checking
>> consistency, that the same string is translated in the same manner,
>> but it's not clear exactly how. And of course, because of context,
>> sometimes variations are desirable.
>
> To achiev
On So, 2007-01-28 at 17:07 +0100, Ole Laursen wrote:
...
> Another thing we perhaps could use the compendium for is checking
> consistency, that the same string is translated in the same manner,
> but it's not clear exactly how. And of course, because of context,
> sometimes variations are desira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danilo Šegan) writes:
> msgmerge has the -C option. One can probably play smart and create
> separate PO files (one gotten from compendium, another with usual
> msgmerge), then use msgattrib to set all in compendium-one as fuzzy
> (and remove all the rest), and then merge again
Hi Ole,
Yesterday at 20:15, Ole Laursen wrote:
> Someone in the Danish team is working on getting a common compendium
> set up. It would be nice if you could augment a .po file with strings
>>from the compendium, with the caveat that the extracted compendium
> strings should be marked fuzzy so th
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 20:15 +0100, Ole Laursen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Someone in the Danish team is working on getting a common compendium
> set up. It would be nice if you could augment a .po file with strings
> from the compendium, with the caveat that the extracted compendium
> strings should be mark
Hi!
Someone in the Danish team is working on getting a common compendium
set up. It would be nice if you could augment a .po file with strings
from the compendium, with the caveat that the extracted compendium
strings should be marked fuzzy so they can be checked (sucking in
strings used in anothe
