Hi,
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:31 -0300, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
> some modules doesn't have a 'gnome-3-10' git branch. I'm not sure why
Because module maintainers are free to decide when they want to branch.
They could even use git master for 3.10.x releases as long as they do
not violate the stri
bout it available on the Damned Lies.
Kind regards,
Victor
From: Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 сентябр 2013 с. 19:31
To: Victor Ibragimov
Cc: Piotr Drąg; gnome-i18n
Subject: Re: Understanding the branches
I believe it is interesting to commit to 'gnome
-10" do you mean
> that is possible to commit to both branches just when "gnome-3-10" is shown
> under the "Branch" on Damned Lies site as a reference?
>
> ** **
>
> Victor****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail
ot; do you mean that
is possible to commit to both branches just when "gnome-3-10" is shown under
the "Branch" on Damned Lies site as a reference?
Victor
From: Rafael Ferreira [mailto:rafael.f...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 сентябр 2013 с. 20:43
To: Victor Ibragimov
Cc: Pi
2013/9/17 Victor Ibragimov
> Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:
>
> What is the difference between the master and development (for example,
> GNOME 3.10 (development)), and old stable?
> If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a
Regarding the branches or to make sure I correctly understand the branches:
What is the difference between the master and development (for example, GNOME
3.10 (development)), and old stable?
If translations or updates are committed to gnome-3-6 now - is this a waste of
time, as gnome-3-6 will no