Am Donnerstag, den 11.01.2007, 13:58 +0100 schrieb Danilo Šegan:
> Today at 4:54, Daniel Elstner wrote:
>
> > The global search and replace turned out to be more difficult than
> > anticipated, due to the darn line wrapping at stupid places in the PO
> > files. Luckily regexxer's interactivity ma
Today at 4:54, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> The global search and replace turned out to be more difficult than
> anticipated, due to the darn line wrapping at stupid places in the PO
> files. Luckily regexxer's interactivity makes it easy
> to do half-automatic global replaces. (Too bad though
> that
Am Dienstag, den 09.01.2007, 21:14 +0100 schrieb Daniel Elstner:
> >
> > > Shall I do so? This would require changes to each and every .po file,
> > > of course. Would it be alright if I do a mass search/replace on all .po
> > > files myself? (Of course using regexxer itself for the job!) Come
Hi Danilo and everyone,
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 11:47 +0100 schrieb Danilo Šegan:
> Today at 1:17, Daniel Elstner wrote:
>
> > Shall I do so? This would require changes to each and every .po file,
> > of course. Would it be alright if I do a mass search/replace on all .po
> > files myself?
Hi Daniel,
Today at 1:17, Daniel Elstner wrote:
> Shall I do so? This would require changes to each and every .po file,
> of course. Would it be alright if I do a mass search/replace on all .po
> files myself? (Of course using regexxer itself for the job!) Come to
> think of it, if I do the m
Hey all,
first, thanks to Gabor Kelemen for clarifying the .pot file issue.
I've got three more questions, however (please bear with me).
I'm planning to change the regexxer source code to use UTF-8 directly in
message strings. Christian Rose recommended to do this a while ago (now
that's an und
