Oops, sorry for missing out to replying to this mail earlier.
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:43 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Today at 11:20, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote:
>
> > There have been quite a lot of string changes in evolution-exchange.
>
> This is in general a very bad timing to do such a thing (st
Hi Michael,
Today at 6:03, Not Zed wrote:
>> > Most of these strings were already translated as part of evolution-
>> > exchange changes, but have now been moved to either of evolution or
>> > evolution-data-server. So, i am not sure if retranslation would be
>> > needed. Most of these strings sh
> > Most of these strings were already translated as part of evolution-
> > exchange changes, but have now been moved to either of evolution or
> > evolution-data-server. So, i am not sure if retranslation would be
> > needed. Most of these strings should only be in evolution, and we are
> > tryin
Today at 11:20, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote:
> There have been quite a lot of string changes in evolution-exchange.
This is in general a very bad timing to do such a thing (string change
announcement is there to make it harder for you to do any string
changes, so you'd avoid them if not really necessar
Hi,
There have been quite a lot of string changes in evolution-exchange.
Most of this has been because of the code migration from evolution-
exchange to evolution-data-server [ under servers/exchange directory ]
and evolution [ under evolution/exchange-operations directory ].
Most of these stri