Hi!
The branch was called gnome-2-20 (don't know why). Updated DL.
Thanks,
Johannes
Am Freitag, den 27.06.2008, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Gabor Kelemen:
> Hi
>
> Any progress on this? Seems this was neither explained, nor reverted,
> also I can't see any unnoticed gnome-2-22 branch.
>
> Regards
> G
Hi!
Am Freitag, den 27.06.2008, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Gabor Kelemen:
> Hi
>
> Any progress on this? Seems this was neither explained, nor reverted,
> also I can't see any unnoticed gnome-2-22 branch.
Oh, there should be a branch (I though there would be...). I will have a
look at it.
Regards,
J
Hi
Any progress on this? Seems this was neither explained, nor reverted,
also I can't see any unnoticed gnome-2-22 branch.
Regards
Gabor Kelemen
Andre Klapper írta:
hi johannes,
seems like your commit (rev574) broke the string freeze. also, is "Use"
a verb or a noun? (please add a translato
hi johannes,
seems like your commit (rev574) broke the string freeze. also, is "Use"
a verb or a noun? (please add a translator comment.)
thanks,
andre
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 12:46 +, GNOME Status Pages wrote:
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http:/
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org/.
There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-build.HEAD':
+ "Advanced options"
+ "Advanced"
+ "Advanced..."
+ "Includes (deprecated):"
+ "Module"
+ "Use"
Note t