Hi Behdad,
Today at 8:41, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Because unfortunately gucharmap is in the unmaintained mode of
> operation. Recently Roozbeh applied a patch to Pango to updated
> to 4.1, and I completed 4.1 support in Pango by updating the bidi
> tables. It was just after that when Behnam no
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Hi Behdad,
>
> Last Monday at 23:15, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> > What is a ucharmap good for if it doesn't support the latest
> > version of the Unicode standard?
>
> This version?
>
> http://www.unicode.org/versions/enumeratedversions.html#Unicode_4_1_0
Hi Behdad,
Last Monday at 23:15, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> What is a ucharmap good for if it doesn't support the latest
> version of the Unicode standard?
This version?
http://www.unicode.org/versions/enumeratedversions.html#Unicode_4_1_0
I mean, it's the one that came out on March 31, 2005, or
Hi,
What is a ucharmap good for if it doesn't support the latest
version of the Unicode standard?
We are trying to update gucharmap to Unicode 4.1 but that
involved some 29 string addition/changes, mostly writing script
names of Unicode block names. They are expected to be either
very easy (simi
