Well you asked for an opinion.
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which
> shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working
> properly.
Well,
Well you asked for an opinion.
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 01:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which
> shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working
> properly.
Well,
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:00 +0100, Danilo Åegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today at 18:27, JP Rosevear wrote:
>
> > So, my original task morphed somewhat and I ended up tidying up the
> > contacts, calendar and shell schema files (and cropped up some
> > additional issues below), I started on the mailer b
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:00 +0100, Danilo Åegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today at 18:27, JP Rosevear wrote:
>
> > So, my original task morphed somewhat and I ended up tidying up the
> > contacts, calendar and shell schema files (and cropped up some
> > additional issues below), I started on the mailer b
Hi Carlos,
Yesterday at 23:36, Carlos Perellà MarÃn wrote:
> Evolution's .pot file is called now evolution-2.2.pot instead of
> evolution-2.0.pot
>
> That's the problem.
>
> Sorry for the delay but I'm with final exams :-(
No need to apologize. I'm myself able to check and correct this, but
I a
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which
> shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working
> properly.
Well, I do and so do the translators at least. There were also non
string related items in the mai
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 09:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which
> shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working
> properly.
Well, I do and so do the translators at least. There were also non
string related items in the mai
Hi Carlos,
Yesterday at 23:36, Carlos Perellà MarÃn wrote:
> Evolution's .pot file is called now evolution-2.2.pot instead of
> evolution-2.0.pot
>
> That's the problem.
>
> Sorry for the delay but I'm with final exams :-(
No need to apologize. I'm myself able to check and correct this, but
I a
My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working properly.
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 12:27 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
When looking at 61075 I noticed some inconsistency/issues with our
schema files. I also looked
My opinion is 'who cares', its only for the registry editor, which shouldn't ever be being used anyway, if all things are working properly.
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 12:27 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
When looking at 61075 I noticed some inconsistency/issues with our
schema files. I also looked
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 23:00 +0100, Danilo ¦egan wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi
[...]
> According to last update, we also have problems updating evolution POT
> files in our stats, so that may be of bigger influence than these
> changes (depending on how long this is the case).
>
> This might be only GTP'
Hi,
Today at 18:27, JP Rosevear wrote:
> So, my original task morphed somewhat and I ended up tidying up the
> contacts, calendar and shell schema files (and cropped up some
> additional issues below), I started on the mailer but it has more than
> the other three combined so I started to get wor
When looking at 61075 I noticed some inconsistency/issues with our
schema files. I also looked at how we compared to the "de facto" style
guide in:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2003-July/msg00076.html
Our long descriptions generally end in periods. Literal values are
sometimes in qu
13 matches
Mail list logo
