Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-13 Thread Elijah Newren
On 4/13/06, Raphael Higino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/13/06, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With the three necessary approvals from you, Kjartan, and Luis, I have > > now committed the patch to the gnome-2-14 branch. I'd like to make a > > bug fix release soon. I would do it

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-13 Thread Raphael Higino
On 4/13/06, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With the three necessary approvals from you, Kjartan, and Luis, I have > now committed the patch to the gnome-2-14 branch. I'd like to make a > bug fix release soon. I would do it now, especially since the strings > are extremely unlikely to

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-13 Thread Elijah Newren
On 4/12/06, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have your string freeze approval from me. From looking at the > patch (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=61971) attached to > the bug report (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326159), it > seems the only new strings tha

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-13 Thread Luis Villa
On 4/12/06, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ons, 12,.04.2006 kl. 10.38 -0600, skrev Elijah Newren: > > Hi, > > > > Yeah, I suck. I know alarm bells are going off and this looks pretty > > bad. However, the focus behavior for programs launched from a > > terminal unfortunately appears

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-13 Thread Elijah Newren
On 4/13/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering before giving an approval: what are the plans in the > future wrt to this? Do you plan to keep this option? Or do you think we > can have a better solution? I believe this patch is the better solution to the strict focus patches

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-13 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 13/04/2006, at 2:08 AM, Elijah Newren wrote: Alternative ideas welcome. I know this really, really sucks, and I should be publicly whipped, If you're really volunteering, this could be a good fund-raiser for Gnome. I don't think we've had a public whipping for ages. :D from Clytie

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mercredi 12 avril 2006 à 10:38 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > So, I'd like to apply Ron Yorston's patch in bug 326159 to make a > focus_new_windows option, which simultaneously changes the default > behavior back to what it was in 2.12. (I don't feel reverting the > default without addin

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-12 Thread Christian Rose
On 4/12/06, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ons, 12,.04.2006 kl. 10.38 -0600, skrev Elijah Newren: > > Yeah, I suck. I know alarm bells are going off and this looks pretty > > bad. However, the focus behavior for programs launched from a > > terminal unfortunately appears to be really

Re: Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-12 Thread Kjartan Maraas
ons, 12,.04.2006 kl. 10.38 -0600, skrev Elijah Newren: > Hi, > > Yeah, I suck. I know alarm bells are going off and this looks pretty > bad. However, the focus behavior for programs launched from a > terminal unfortunately appears to be really badly hated (yes, this > only affects users using a

Request for freeze break -- feature & string freeze for 2.14.x cycle

2006-04-12 Thread Elijah Newren
Hi, Yeah, I suck. I know alarm bells are going off and this looks pretty bad. However, the focus behavior for programs launched from a terminal unfortunately appears to be really badly hated (yes, this only affects users using a terminal). Ubuntu has already patched it out (though I'm getting l