O/H Jorge González González έγραψε:
>> 3) The abbreviations will never be widely used or known if nobody takes
>> the initiative to use them.
> We have been using them at the the Spanish GTP at least since I joined, in
> 2004.
Also, the Fedora Documentation Project uses them consistently.
-d
-
> 3) The abbreviations will never be widely used or known if nobody takes
> the initiative to use them.
We have been using them at the the Spanish GTP at least since I joined, in 2004.
--
Jorge González González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Weblog: http://aloriel.no-ip.org
Fotolog: http://www.flickr.com/ph
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 14:46 -0400, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:34 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> >
> > > You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> > > As I translator, I have sta
Sven Neumann skrev:
> Since when do the translators do such decisions on their own? The only
> reasonable thing to do at this point is to bring up the question on
> desktop-devel-list and wait for a decision.
You are totally correct.
If we are going to use IEEE 1541, that should be on a global s
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:28 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> So if gnome-vfs is not going to be fix, you can :
> - fix each program (that's what i did
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-system-monitor/branches/gnome-2-14/src/util.c?r1=1159&r2=1205
> )
I would even rate that patch as wrong. U
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:28 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> I'm totally for it.
>
> They were bugs against gnome-vfs but they were closed WONTFIX IIRC.
>
> So if gnome-vfs is not going to be fix, you can :
> - fix each program (that's what i did
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-system-mon
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 18:30 +0200, Sven Neumann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301838
--
Benoît D
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 18:30 +0200, Sven Neumann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
>
> > I was thinking about bug reporting all applications tha
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit :
> I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
> convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate KiB, MiB, GiB
> etc.
>
> What do you think
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:34 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
>
> > You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> > As I translator, I have started to notice that more and more
> > applications start to use this new co
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> As I translator, I have started to notice that more and more
> applications start to use this new convention. For the beginning I was a
> bit negative but started to lik
Sven Neumann skrev:
> Could you please point me to this discussion?
No, since I was just guessing.
> Might be more correct, but I don't think it would be more appropriate.
> While kB, MB and GB are common and well-known abbreviations, KiB, MiB,
> GiB and the like are not widely used and would c
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
Could you please point me to this discussion?
> I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
> convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate K
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 17:49 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit :
> I guess this topic has been discussed before but..
>
> I was thinking about bug reporting all applications that use the "old"
> convention (kB, MB, GB) and start use the more appropriate KiB, MiB, GiB
> etc.
>
> What do you think
14 matches
Mail list logo
