On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Fabio Tomat wrote:
> Hello community,
> I really don't want to bother, but I don't understand this word in
> gsettings-desktop-schemas, I'm startint to think it's a typo.
>
> "List of x-content/* types for which the user have chosen to start an
> application in the
Hi!
> But I agree with you. Some teams like to skip the schema strings for now
> anyway. That's why the handful of GSettings based module maintainers
> could think about to split the po files as GTK already does for a long
> time. In GTK, there are the folders "po" and "po-properties". The second
Am Mittwoch, den 22.12.2010, 17:40 +0200 schrieb Lucian Adrian Grijincu:
> 2010/12/20 Mario Blättermann :
> > The question is now: does it make sense to make
> > the keys translatable?
>
>
> If the answer is yes (for whatever reasons) it would be extremely nice
> to have them in a separate .po fi
2010/12/20 Mario Blättermann :
> The question is now: does it make sense to make
> the keys translatable?
If the answer is yes (for whatever reasons) it would be extremely nice
to have them in a separate .po file.
In my view the priority is: UI, help, gsettings, but because UI and
gsettings are
Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 16:38 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
>
> This certainly applies for gconf scheme descriptions but I have no idea
> if that app works with gsettings/dconf.
>
In the current gconf-editor it doesn't work, but the dconf-editor (with
is mostly part of the dconf package, at lea
Il giorno lun, 20/12/2010 alle 15.45 +0100, Mario Blättermann ha
scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> some months ago the gsettings-desktop-schemas module was added to the
> Damned Lies pages. It rests in peace since, because the status view
> shows zero strings from the beginning. The command »intltool-update«
Il giorno lun, 20/12/2010 alle 15.41 +0100, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 15:45 +0100 schrieb Mario Blättermann:
> > Which prerequisites are needed to make it work?
>
> First question is: Why should it be translated?
For the same reason we translated gconf keys descriptio
Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 16:33 +0100 schrieb Mario Blättermann:
> Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 15:41 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> > Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 15:45 +0100 schrieb Mario Blättermann:
> > > Which prerequisites are needed to make it work?
> >
> > First question is: Why should it be
Hi!
> Of course it contents only scheme descriptions, as the module name
> suggests. Scheme descriptions are displayed in gconf-editor, and it is
> really important in my mind to have them localized, although some GTP
> teams want to skip them. We have this tool for rarely used and not in
> the U
Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 15:41 +0100 schrieb Andre Klapper:
> Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 15:45 +0100 schrieb Mario Blättermann:
> > Which prerequisites are needed to make it work?
>
> First question is: Why should it be translated?
Andre, if I remember correctly, you was the guy who had asked f
Am Montag, den 20.12.2010, 15:45 +0100 schrieb Mario Blättermann:
> Which prerequisites are needed to make it work?
First question is: Why should it be translated?
Currently it only contains scheme descriptions, and I don't know of any
user interface application that displays them.
andre
--
mai
11 matches
Mail list logo