Re: committing updated po files

2005-10-02 Thread Tino Meinen
> > 4) In case not commiting same changes by translators before someone will > >commit changes added by update-po target translator only must merge > >own/not commited yet changes using msgmerge command from > >#.po. file created by cvs client and without loosing single > >line

Re: committing updated po files

2005-10-02 Thread Christian Rose
ons 2005-09-28 klockan 15:31 +0200 skrev Tomasz Kłoczko: > > Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 à 13:56 +0300, Tommi Vainikainen a écrit : > > > On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > > > there are some good rea

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-29 Thread Ross Golder
On พ., 2005-09-28 at 15:31 +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Christian Persch wrote: > > > > I've been getting bounces for all messages to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; it appears the cvs-commits-list mails have > > an invalid From: address :( Indeed the 'from' address in commit e-mai

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-29 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Christian Rose wrote: > ons 2005-09-28 klockan 13:56 +0300 skrev Tommi Vainikainen: > > On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please reve

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-29 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Christian Persch wrote: > Hi, > > Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 à 13:56 +0300, Tommi Vainikainen a écrit : > > On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > > there are some good reasons for t

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-28 Thread Christian Rose
ons 2005-09-28 klockan 23:35 +0200 skrev Christian Rose: > ons 2005-09-28 klockan 13:56 +0300 skrev Tommi Vainikainen: > > On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-28 Thread Christian Rose
ons 2005-09-28 klockan 13:56 +0300 skrev Tommi Vainikainen: > On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these > > changes. > > Was there ever any co

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-28 Thread Ross Golder
On พ., 2005-09-28 at 14:37 +0200, Christian Persch wrote: > I've been getting bounces for all messages to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; it appears the cvs-commits-list mails have > an invalid From: address :( > Yep, [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't always necessarily map to a real mailbox. I'll see if it can be

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-28 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 à 13:56 +0300, Tommi Vainikainen a écrit : > On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these > > changes. > > Was

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-28 Thread Tommi Vainikainen
On 2005-09-20T18:44:55+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these > changes. Was there ever any conclusion for this thread? I see that Thomas has done more this kind of c

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 22:31 +0200, Christian Persch a écrit : > Hi, > > Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : > > ["everywhere" being epiphany, metacity, gnome-control-center, > > gnome-panel so far.] > And gail, bug-buddy, libbonoboui, evolution. > > I've r

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mercredi 21 septembre 2005 à 00:14 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : > Yesterday at 22:38, Christian Persch wrote: > > >> Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : > >> > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > >> > there are some good reasons

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Danilo Šegan
Yesterday at 22:38, Christian Persch wrote: >> Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : >> > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope >> > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these >> > changes. >> >> > ["everywhere" be

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, > Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : > > Tomasz, why did you need to do this everywhere? :( I really hope > > there are some good reasons for this. Anyway, please revert all these > > changes. > > > ["everywhere" being epiphany, metacity, gnome-control-center,

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le mardi 20 septembre 2005 à 17:44 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : > Today at 16:05, Christian Persch wrote: > > > When and where has it been agreed to do that? I think those changes > > should be reverted. > > Yes, they should. Even more so because they not only are going to > cause conflict

Re: committing updated po files

2005-09-20 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 16:05, Christian Persch wrote: > When and where has it been agreed to do that? I think those changes > should be reverted. Yes, they should. Even more so because they not only are going to cause conflicts (which is why we do not recommend otherwise commiting the result of update-po), bu