Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 21:24 +0100, Jorge González wrote: > Definitely we're gonna ship something that will get people excited, at > least to those who speak English, since I cannot remember that many > string freeze breaks, late updates, bla-bla-blah since many, many > releases ago. I doubt many te

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi Matthias! > From my perspective as a release team member, the overarching goal is > to ship something that will get people excited about GNOME 3. > Considering that we cut down a lot on other 'tweakability' aspects, > having at least set of fresh backgrounds to go with the new background > pane

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Jorge González
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 21:15, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Christian Rose wrote: >> 2011/3/23 Johannes Schmid : > >> >> Fully agreeing with Johannes here, but want to stress that Release >> Team should be informed of all important freeze breaks and cases when >> free

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Christian Rose wrote: > 2011/3/23 Johannes Schmid : > > Fully agreeing with Johannes here, but want to stress that Release > Team should be informed of all important freeze breaks and cases when > freeze request procedure is not respected. I'm sure breaks against

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Christian Rose
2011/3/23 Andre Klapper : > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 18:56 +0100, Christian Rose wrote: >> Fully agreeing with Johannes here, but want to stress that Release >> Team should be informed of all important freeze breaks and cases when >> freeze request procedure is not respected. I'm sure breaks against >

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 18:56 +0100, Christian Rose wrote: > Fully agreeing with Johannes here, but want to stress that Release > Team should be informed of all important freeze breaks and cases when > freeze request procedure is not respected. I'm sure breaks against > hard code freeze like these

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Christian Rose
2011/3/23 Johannes Schmid : > Hi Jon! > >> > The commits were: > > Sorry, this isn't the way to handle string freeze requests. You didn't > get any approval to change that strings. They don't really look release > critical to me either. > > Please follow the official way for string freeze breaks. A

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi Jon! > > The commits were: Sorry, this isn't the way to handle string freeze requests. You didn't get any approval to change that strings. They don't really look release critical to me either. Please follow the official way for string freeze breaks. As F Wolff is pointing out there should be

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2011-03-23 Thread F Wolff
Op Di, 2011-03-22 om 15:10 -0400 skryf William Jon McCann: > Hi, > > We have a few string changes in gnome-backgrounds that I should describe. > > The commits were: > > 1. > http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-backgrounds/commit/?id=41c743054269a4aa20aab2862258f4bc9e41b698 > > This removes a fe

Re: String changes in gnome-backgrounds

2006-01-28 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On 1/28/06, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just checked in a new set of backgrounds for 2.14, which means lots > of string changes for the gnome-backgrounds module. Apologies for the > number of changes, and the lateness of getting this finalised. branded/GNOME-Curves.png seems to b