On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:19 am, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
If you want to continue using email, then we would need two separate
freeze break requests, one to release team and one to i18n team. This
does happen sometimes, so developers will just need to get used to
asking for freeze breaks in tw
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:54 am, Daniel Mustieles García
wrote:
* We could continue to use email to gnome-i18n@ for string break
requests and just say that release team no longer needs to be
involved
in string freeze breaks
Good, but I have one question here: would Release team made a
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:52 am, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
I like the idea, but I am concerned. Gitlab has notoriously bad
notification handling, and people miss things because of it. Aren’t
you afraid of that, especially with freeze exception requests, which
are time sensitive?
This is the f
El mié., 12 ago. 2020 a las 9:53, Alexandre Franke ()
escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:16 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm fed up with mailman and am trying to decommission the release team
> > mailing list. That means we need a new procedure for handling freeze
> > br
Hi Michael!
El mar., 11 ago. 2020 a las 21:16, Michael Catanzaro ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fed up with mailman and am trying to decommission the release team
> mailing list. That means we need a new procedure for handling freeze
> break requests that's not based on email. We've created:
>
> http
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:16 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'm fed up with mailman and am trying to decommission the release team
> mailing list. That means we need a new procedure for handling freeze
> break requests that's not based on email. We've created:
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.o
