Re: Fwd: major libgweather Locations updates

2008-08-23 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2008/8/21 Kenneth Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2008/8/21 Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 00:48 +0200 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: >> > Yes, well I also got the idea that we sort of agreed on something >> > here, the only thing is that it is still in the statistic

Re: Fwd: major libgweather Locations updates

2008-08-20 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2008/8/21 Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 00:48 +0200 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: > > Yes, well I also got the idea that we sort of agreed on something > > here, the only thing is that it is still in the statistics under gnome > > 2.24, which it shouldn't be if we a

Re: Fwd: major libgweather Locations updates

2008-08-20 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 00:48 +0200 schrieb Kenneth Nielsen: > Yes, well I also got the idea that we sort of agreed on something > here, the only thing is that it is still in the statistics under gnome > 2.24, which it shouldn't be if we all agreed on your proposal. Err... I think I never p

Re: Fwd: major libgweather Locations updates

2008-08-20 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2008/8/20 Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dan Winship píše v St 20. 08. 2008 v 15:44 -0400: > > Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > > > On another note, seeing the size of this change makes me wonder. It > must > > > have taken an immence development effort to complete this update, > > > We need to come

Re: Fwd: major libgweather Locations updates

2008-08-20 Thread Andre Klapper
Dan Winship píše v St 20. 08. 2008 v 15:44 -0400: > Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > > On another note, seeing the size of this change makes me wonder. It must > > have taken an immence development effort to complete this update, > > We need to come to some agreement on this soon > > Most of the translato

Re: Fwd: major libgweather Locations updates

2008-08-20 Thread Dan Winship
Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > On another note, seeing the size of this change makes me wonder. It must > have taken an immence development effort to complete this update, > streching over quite some time, would it really have been so difficult > to warn us back when you began and then to commit every on