Re: Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-23 Thread Marek Černocký
Due to the reorganization I have the question about module libgda. Why it's included in two sets - External Dependencies and Office Productivity Applications? Regards Marv Claude Paroz píše v Ne 16. 01. 2011 v 21:49 +0100: > Hi, > > In the next days, I will try to begin moving some modules in an

Re: Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-21 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > gconf, metacity, gnome-panel and notification-daemon are used for the > so-called fallback mode (when your hardware doesn't support 3D > acceleration). Small correction: gconf is still in because not all modules have been ported to gsettings, yet. Most important here is evolution. So you wi

Re: Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-21 Thread Claude Paroz
Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 20:58 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka a écrit : > Is gconf left for GNOME 3.0? I thought it was going to be replaced by > other mechanism... gconf, metacity, gnome-panel and notification-daemon are used for the so-called fallback mode (when your hardware doesn't support 3D acc

Re: Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-21 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Is gconf left for GNOME 3.0? I thought it was going to be replaced by other mechanism... On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 20:48, Claude Paroz wrote: > Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 21:49 +0100, Claude Paroz a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> In the next days, I will try to begin moving some modules in and out the >>

Re: Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-21 Thread Claude Paroz
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 21:49 +0100, Claude Paroz a écrit : > Hi, > > In the next days, I will try to begin moving some modules in and out the > GNOME release set to better match the real modules used by GNOME 3, > based on JHBuild gnome-3.0 modulesets. > http://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/

Re: Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-16 Thread Gil Forcada
El dg 16 de 01 de 2011 a les 21:49 +0100, en/na Claude Paroz va escriure: > Hi, > > In the next days, I will try to begin moving some modules in and out the > GNOME release set to better match the real modules used by GNOME 3, > based on JHBuild gnome-3.0 modulesets. > http://git.gnome.org/browse/

Module reorganisation for GNOME 3

2011-01-16 Thread Claude Paroz
Hi, In the next days, I will try to begin moving some modules in and out the GNOME release set to better match the real modules used by GNOME 3, based on JHBuild gnome-3.0 modulesets. http://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/tree/modulesets So don't be too suprised to see your stats getting up and dow

GNOME module reorganisation

2010-06-02 Thread jhs
Hi! The release-team has sent a proposal for GNOME module reorganization. This highly affects translation so I would encourage the team coordinators to participate in this discussion (some have already) and of course everybody else interested. The announcement is here: http://mail.gnome.org/archi

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-02 Thread Mario Blättermann
Am Dienstag, den 02.03.2010, 18:33 +0100 schrieb Claude Paroz: > As it seems we got only positive feedback, I added the new "GIMP and > Friends" release set on l10n.gnome.org. > This also let us pack the whole bunch of GIMP help files (more than > 12'000 strings) on its own page. > And what about

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-02 Thread Matej Urban
GREAT! That's perfect! Thanks, M! ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-02 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 01 mars 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Jorge González González a écrit : > El lun, 01-03-2010 a las 09:11 +0100, Matej Urbančič escribió: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to propose a small reorganisation of module groups. I'd like > > to see all gimp modules grouped in it's own "release", like gnome > >

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-01 Thread Petr Kovar
Jorge González González , Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:02:25 +0100: > El lun, 01-03-2010 a las 09:11 +0100, Matej Urbančič escribió: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to propose a small reorganisation of module groups. I'd like > > to see all gimp modules grouped in it's own "release", like gnome > > office is

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-01 Thread Jorge González González
El lun, 01-03-2010 a las 09:11 +0100, Matej Urbančič escribió: > Hello, > > I'd like to propose a small reorganisation of module groups. I'd like > to see all gimp modules grouped in it's own "release", like gnome > office is and not under gnome-extra. First reason is, that it is one > big project

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-01 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi! Mario Blättermann , Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:00:08 +0100: (...) > And as you mention the office module group, in my mind the modules > "glabels" and "glom" should be part of it. I recognize them as office > software, because their documentations are in the "office" section at > library.gnome.org.

Re: Module reorganisation

2010-03-01 Thread Mario Blättermann
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 09:11 +0100 schrieb Matej Urbančič: > Hello, > > I'd like to propose a small reorganisation of module groups. I'd like > to see all gimp modules grouped in it's own "release", like gnome > office is and not under gnome-extra. First reason is, that it is one > big projec

Module reorganisation

2010-03-01 Thread Matej Urbančič
Hello, I'd like to propose a small reorganisation of module groups. I'd like to see all gimp modules grouped in it's own "release", like gnome office is and not under gnome-extra. First reason is, that it is one big project and second one is easier overview. What do you think? Is it doable withou