Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

2006-02-13 Thread Frederic RUAUDEL
Hi Christian, Christian Rose wrote: > On 2/11/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > I could find no information about the following perviously proposed > modules, but I assume that they will not be included, and as a > consequence I have moved them from "proposed" to "extra

Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

2006-02-13 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 14/02/2006, at 3:58 AM, Danilo Šegan wrote: Today at 5:42, Clytie Siddall wrote: Christian, pyorbit and gnome-python-desktop have not been available on the status pages for translation. Where do we find the files, to translate them? They don't have any translatable strings. So we don't

Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

2006-02-13 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi Clytie, Today at 5:42, Clytie Siddall wrote: > Christian, pyorbit and gnome-python-desktop have not been available > on the status pages for translation. Where do we find the files, to > translate them? They don't have any translatable strings. Cheers, Danilo ___

Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

2006-02-12 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 13/02/2006, at 8:01 AM, Christian Rose wrote (severely in part): + for reference, other proposed modules that were previously accepted: pyorbit, deskbar-applet, fast-user-switch-applet, gnome-python-desktop, pessulus, sabayon Christian, pyorbit and gnome-python-desktop have not

Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

2006-02-12 Thread Elijah Newren
On 2/12/06, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, based on this list I have moved the following modules in the GNOME > 2.14 translation status from the "proposed" section to the "desktop" > section: > > deskbar-applet > fast-user-switch-applet > gnome-screensaver > pessulus > sabayon > >

Re: Module decisions for GNOME 2.14

2006-02-12 Thread Christian Rose
On 2/11/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The release team met yesterday to talk about all the current issues. > Here are our conclusions. > > New modules: > > + gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed, > and more integration should be done. It