Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 à 14:13 +0200, Christian Persch a écrit :
> Hi;
>
> Am Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:46:04 +0200
> schrieb Claude Paroz :
> > Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 14:13 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
> > Why isn't the correct branch of vte listed in JHBuild
> > gnome-suites-core-deps-3.0.modules
Hi;
Am Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:46:04 +0200
schrieb Claude Paroz :
> Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 14:13 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
> Why isn't the correct branch of vte listed in JHBuild
> gnome-suites-core-deps-3.0.modules ?
> Shouldn't it be instead of .
Yes, it should. I don't know why it wasn't c
Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 14:13 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
> Il giorno mar, 12/04/2011 alle 13.59 +0200, Christian Persch ha scritto:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I noticed that on http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ the only branches
> > listed are master, vte-0-24 and vte-0-22, missing the vte-0-26, and,
>
Le mardi 12 avril 2011 à 14:13 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
> Il giorno mar, 12/04/2011 alle 13.59 +0200, Christian Persch ha scritto:
> > Hi;
> >
> > I noticed that on http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ the only branches
> > listed are master, vte-0-24 and vte-0-22, missing the vte-0-26, and,
>
Il giorno mar, 12/04/2011 alle 13.59 +0200, Christian Persch ha scritto:
> Hi;
>
> I noticed that on http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ the only branches
> listed are master, vte-0-24 and vte-0-22, missing the vte-0-26, and,
> critically, the vte-0-28 branch from which releases for GNOME 3.0.x will
Hi;
I noticed that on http://l10n.gnome.org/module/vte/ the only branches
listed are master, vte-0-24 and vte-0-22, missing the vte-0-26, and,
critically, the vte-0-28 branch from which releases for GNOME 3.0.x will
come. Can the vte-0-28 branch be added please? The vte-0-22, 0-24 and
0-26 branche
