Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Not Zed
Hmm, why on earth didn't i think of actually running make ... oh well. Just committed fixes for that and a couple of the other ones which also broke. Sorry about that. On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:40 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > On 6/21/05, Not Zed wrote: > > > > Lads, > > > > Alright, i've commi

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Luis Villa
On 6/21/05, Not Zed wrote: > > Lads, > > Alright, i've committed it. Monster commit too, so hopefully all is > right. Ironically, it dies in en_AU in the tinderbox: http://tieguy.org/misc/temp-tinderbox-dump/evolution.html Luis > On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:06 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Ok guys,

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 12:16, Clytie Siddall wrote: > I didn't know you could do that. I thought we had to leave them > there. :( No, you can remove them all if you wish from your particular translation. It's up to you to decide which are worth keeping and which are not. >> Some strings can certainly be remo

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Clytie Siddall
Thanks for your reply, Danilo. :) On 21/06/2005, at 6:56 PM, Danilo Šegan wrote: If gal is to be merged with evolution, could we please consider removing the more than 85% obsolete strings which bloat the evolution file so appallingly? Before we make it bigger still? You should do that yours

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 5:00, Clytie Siddall wrote: > If gal is to be merged with evolution, could we please consider > removing the more than 85% obsolete strings which bloat the evolution > file so appallingly? Before we make it bigger still? You should do that yourself for your language only. The catch is t

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Not Zed
Oh - I didn't copy across the Thai or Bangla translations from gal, they seemed out of date anyway, and contain far fewer strings than evolution, so wouldn't be much use I think. Michael On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:06 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > Ok guys, I will be starting the merge in the next couple

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-21 Thread Not Zed
Lads, Alright, i've committed it. Monster commit too, so hopefully all is right. Regards, Michael On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:06 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > Ok guys, I will be starting the merge in the next couple of hours, i'll > let you know when its done. Hopefully you're all sleeping now and ca

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-20 Thread Not Zed
Ok guys, I will be starting the merge in the next couple of hours, i'll let you know when its done. Hopefully you're all sleeping now and can wake up to it all complete (and hopefully not f*kd up). Cheers, Michael On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 02:10 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote: > Yesterday at 9:04, Kaus

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-20 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 20/06/2005, at 4:34 PM, Kaushal Kumar wrote: Gal, which is retired from Head, contains translatable strings. So, we would need to merge it's po contents into those of evolution [1]. Michael Zucchi has kindly agreed to perform this operation. Could you please advise when this could be carr

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-20 Thread Funda Wang
Kaushal> Could you please advise when this could be carried out. for i in gal/po/*.po do msgcat --use-first evolution/po/`basename $i` $i -o evolution/po/`basename $i` done ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/m

Re: Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-20 Thread Danilo Šegan
Yesterday at 9:04, Kaushal Kumar wrote: > Gal, which is retired from Head, contains translatable strings. So, we > would need to merge it's po contents into those of evolution [1]. > Michael Zucchi has kindly agreed to perform this operation. > > Could you please advise when this could be carried

Merging po strings of gal (retired) into evolution

2005-06-20 Thread Kaushal Kumar
Hi, Gal, which is retired from Head, contains translatable strings. So, we would need to merge it's po contents into those of evolution [1]. Michael Zucchi has kindly agreed to perform this operation. Could you please advise when this could be carried out. Thanks, Kaushal [1]: Request everyo