Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 17 septembre 2007 à 19:01 +0530, Runa Bhattacharjee a écrit : > Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > > >> Now, the problem remains between svn.gnome.org and l10n.gnome.org. The > >> post-commit hook doesn't work at the moment. > >> It

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 17 septembre 2007 à 15:07 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:06:32PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > > Now, the problem remains between svn.gnome.org and l10n.gnome.org. The > > > post-commit hook does

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-17 Thread Runa Bhattacharjee
Olav Vitters wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > >> Now, the problem remains between svn.gnome.org and l10n.gnome.org. The >> post-commit hook doesn't work at the moment. >> It's really the worse moment for this to happen :-( >> > > Could you be more spe

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-17 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > Now, the problem remains between svn.gnome.org and l10n.gnome.org. The > post-commit hook doesn't work at the moment. > It's really the worse moment for this to happen :-( Could you be more specific? l10n couldn't reach svn.g.o. This

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-17 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:06:32PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > Now, the problem remains between svn.gnome.org and l10n.gnome.org. The > > post-commit hook doesn't work at the moment. > > It's really the worse moment for this to happ

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 17 septembre 2007 à 12:45 +0700, Ross Golder a écrit : > Runa Bhattacharjee wrote: > > Ross Golder wrote: > >> The remote console unit on progress.gnome.org has become unresponsive, > >> so we're going to need to power cycle that server at some point soon. It > >> should only be down for a

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-16 Thread Runa Bhattacharjee
Ross Golder wrote: > Runa Bhattacharjee wrote: > >> Ross Golder wrote: >> >>> The remote console unit on progress.gnome.org has become unresponsive, >>> so we're going to need to power cycle that server at some point soon. It >>> should only be down for a couple of minutes, but if you have

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-16 Thread Ross Golder
Runa Bhattacharjee wrote: > Ross Golder wrote: >> The remote console unit on progress.gnome.org has become unresponsive, >> so we're going to need to power cycle that server at some point soon. It >> should only be down for a couple of minutes, but if you have trouble >> accessing the site, please

Re: L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-16 Thread Runa Bhattacharjee
Ross Golder wrote: > The remote console unit on progress.gnome.org has become unresponsive, > so we're going to need to power cycle that server at some point soon. It > should only be down for a couple of minutes, but if you have trouble > accessing the site, please try again later. It is still dow

L10N.gnome.org reboot required

2007-09-16 Thread Ross Golder
The remote console unit on progress.gnome.org has become unresponsive, so we're going to need to power cycle that server at some point soon. It should only be down for a couple of minutes, but if you have trouble accessing the site, please try again later. -- Ross _