Re: GConf branched

2009-05-05 Thread Deniz Koçak
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I've just created a gnome-2-26 branch for GConf. > I had to remove a single translation from ne.po before being able to > do so, since msgfmt -c was complaining about it. > > The reason for branching is that I want to fix > http://bugzilla.g

GConf branched

2009-05-05 Thread Matthias Clasen
I've just created a gnome-2-26 branch for GConf. I had to remove a single translation from ne.po before being able to do so, since msgfmt -c was complaining about it. The reason for branching is that I want to fix http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558619 which will allow the defaults servi

Re: GConf branched for 2.24

2008-10-22 Thread Gil Forcada
Hi, D-L updated! Cheers, El dc 22 de 10 de 2008 a les 22:39 +0200, en/na Christian Persch va escriure: > Hi; > > I branched gconf for 2.24; the branch name is "gnome-2-24" as usual. > > Regards, > Christian > ___ > gnome-doc-list mailing list >

GConf branched for 2.24

2008-10-22 Thread Christian Persch
Hi; I branched gconf for 2.24; the branch name is "gnome-2-24" as usual. Regards, Christian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: GConf branched for 2.22

2008-05-09 Thread Gabor Kelemen
Ray Strode írta: > Hi, > > I've branched GConf for 2.22 so that a patch I posted to bug 507310 > can go on trunk. > > Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated. Regards Gabor Kelemen ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/

GConf branched for 2.22

2008-05-09 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, I've branched GConf for 2.22 so that a patch I posted to bug 507310 can go on trunk. (Initially I committed the patch without branching and then Andre pointed out to me on IRC that it broke string freeze). Just a heads up, --Ray ___ gnome-i18n mail

Re: gconf branched

2008-01-08 Thread Gil Forcada
thanks, DL updated El dt 08 de 01 del 2008 a les 15:17 +0100, en/na Kjartan Maraas va escriure: > Hi. > > I just created a gnome-2-20 gconf branch so that I could fix some > strings on trunk. > > Cheers > Kjartan > > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list

gconf branched

2008-01-08 Thread Kjartan Maraas
Hi. I just created a gnome-2-20 gconf branch so that I could fix some strings on trunk. Cheers Kjartan ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: gconf branched for 2.18

2007-04-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le mardi 17 avril 2007 à 09:11 +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka a écrit : > У Аўт, 17/04/2007 у 10:28 +0200, Claude Paroz піша: > > Le lundi 16 avril 2007 à 17:37 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > > On 4/16/07, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've branched GConf for g

Re: gconf branched for 2.18

2007-04-17 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
У Аўт, 17/04/2007 у 10:28 +0200, Claude Paroz піша: > Le lundi 16 avril 2007 à 17:37 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > On 4/16/07, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've branched GConf for gnome 2.18, so I can commit a string change on > > > trunk. The branch is cal

Re: gconf branched for 2.18

2007-04-17 Thread Claude Paroz
Le lundi 16 avril 2007 à 17:37 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > On 4/16/07, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've branched GConf for gnome 2.18, so I can commit a string change on > > trunk. The branch is called "gnome-2-18"; I've already switched the > > jhbuild 2.18 mod

Re: gconf branched for 2.18

2007-04-16 Thread Elijah Newren
On 4/16/07, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've branched GConf for gnome 2.18, so I can commit a string change on > trunk. The branch is called "gnome-2-18"; I've already switched the > jhbuild 2.18 moduleset. Adding gnome-doc-list, gnome-i18n, and desktop-devel-list to the

Re: gconf branched?

2006-05-11 Thread Abel Cheung
On 5/6/06, Josep Puigdemont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: May Has gconf silently branched, maybe? It is done, but not silently, kmaraas has announced it. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2006-May/msg00010.html Abel /Josep ___ gnome-i18n ma

gconf branched?

2006-05-05 Thread Josep Puigdemont
May Has gconf silently branched, maybe? /Josep ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: GConf branched for 2.12

2005-12-11 Thread Christian Rose
On 12/9/05, Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > GConf has branched - 2.12 stuff on the gnome-2-12 branch. Thanks for the notice. The translation status pages should show the new stable branch soon. Christian ___ gnome-i18n mailin

GConf branched for 2.12

2005-12-09 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi, GConf has branched - 2.12 stuff on the gnome-2-12 branch. Cheers, Mark. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: GConf branched

2005-03-15 Thread Danilo Šegan
Yesterday at 16:35, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > GNOME 2.10.x development is now on the gnome-2-10 branch of > gconf. Same here: thanks for the notice Mark, translation status pages should show the new branch next time they update. Cheers, Danilo __

GConf branched

2005-03-14 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi, GNOME 2.10.x development is now on the gnome-2-10 branch of gconf. Cheers, Mark. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n