On 12/12/06, Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my evaluation (with GTP spokesperson hat on) of the Gnome
> modules which are proposed for inclusion in 2.18. It's based only on
> the perceived "localizability" of the app, usually untested, but
> judging by the strings in
Il giorno sab, 16/12/2006 alle 12.54 +0100, Luca Ferretti ha scritto:
> Il giorno mar, 12/12/2006 alle 21.12 +0100, Danilo Šegan ha scritto:
> > Only 3 translations, but the file is reasonably small (<100 messages).
>
> There are some spurious messages too: the search GUI is derived from
> gnome-
Il giorno mar, 12/12/2006 alle 21.12 +0100, Danilo Šegan ha scritto:
> = tracker =
>
> No strong objections.
>
> It uses Gnome CVS, there is some i18n support, but it hasn't been
> announced for translation (so no status pages).
Sorry, my fault, I forgot to announce and add to l10n-status.gnome
Hi all,
This is my evaluation (with GTP spokesperson hat on) of the Gnome
modules which are proposed for inclusion in 2.18. It's based only on
the perceived "localizability" of the app, usually untested, but
judging by the strings in the PO files, and how comfortable will GTP
in working with them
Hi Don,
Today at 17:59, Don Scorgie wrote:
> What about gnome-main-menu [1]? Is it still proposed (I may have missed
> something)? What's the i18n teams take on it?
It's not listed in any of the ReleaseSuites on
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen
So, what's the status on that one?
Ch
Hi all,
This is my evaluation (with GTP spokesperson hat on) of the Gnome
modules which are proposed for inclusion in 2.18. It's based only on
the perceived "localizability" of the app, usually untested, but
judging by the strings in the PO files, and how comfortable will GTP
in working with them
Hi,
What about gnome-main-menu [1]? Is it still proposed (I may have missed
something)? What's the i18n teams take on it?
Thanks
Don
[1]
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00221.html
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 21:12 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is m
Hi,
I don't think its a good idea to include Anjuta - Regardless to any GTP
issue. Anjuta is not stable and tends to crash.
Yair
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 21:12 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> = Anjuta =
>
> No strong objections.
>
___
gnome-i18n mailin
Hi all,
This is my evaluation (with GTP spokesperson hat on) of the Gnome
modules which are proposed for inclusion in 2.18. It's based only on
the perceived "localizability" of the app, usually untested, but
judging by the strings in the PO files, and how comfortable will GTP
in working with them
