2017-09-21 21:24 GMT+02:00 Claude Paroz :
> Le 21. 09. 17 à 20:10, Claude Paroz a écrit :
>>
>> Le 21. 09. 17 à 20:04, Piotr Drąg a écrit :
>>>
>>> 2017-09-21 11:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García
>>> :
And what about trying to implement this on DL?
Some weeks ago, I proposed
Le 21. 09. 17 à 20:10, Claude Paroz a écrit :
Le 21. 09. 17 à 20:04, Piotr Drąg a écrit :
2017-09-21 11:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García
:
And what about trying to implement this on DL?
Some weeks ago, I proposed a possible solution for this [1]. Although
it's
not perfect, it would be be
Le 21. 09. 17 à 20:04, Piotr Drąg a écrit :
2017-09-21 11:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García :
And what about trying to implement this on DL?
Some weeks ago, I proposed a possible solution for this [1]. Although it's
not perfect, it would be better than nothing, and we always can add some
err
2017-09-21 11:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García :
> And what about trying to implement this on DL?
>
> Some weeks ago, I proposed a possible solution for this [1]. Although it's
> not perfect, it would be better than nothing, and we always can add some
> error control to avoid breaking the repo
The branch 'gnome-3-26' was created pointing to:
7b911bd... prepare for 3.26.0 release
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
And what about trying to implement this on DL?
Some weeks ago, I proposed a possible solution for this [1]. Although it's
not perfect, it would be better than nothing, and we always can add some
error control to avoid breaking the repo
Regards!
[1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2017