Re: Evolution translation commit reverted

2013-08-21 Thread Christian Kirbach
Am Mittwoch, den 21.08.2013, 10:35 -0400 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 16:19 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > Committing the translation with this tag fixed should not break the > > compiling process. Would you mind to try it? > > Nice catch, that fixed it. > > I reappl

Re: Evolution translation commit reverted

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Great, thanks! :) 2013/8/21 Matthew Barnes > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 16:19 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > Committing the translation with this tag fixed should not break the > > compiling process. Would you mind to try it? > > Nice catch, that fixed it. > > I reapplied the commit for E

[Fwd: Re: Evolution translation commit reverted]

2013-08-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
Just for the record, since you forgot to CC the list. Forwarded Message From: Daniel Mustieles García Reply-to: daniel.mustie...@gmail.com To: Matthew Barnes Subject: Re: Evolution translation commit reverted Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:19:04 +0200 The X-Generator header is just

Re: Evolution translation commit reverted

2013-08-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 16:19 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Committing the translation with this tag fixed should not break the > compiling process. Would you mind to try it? Nice catch, that fixed it. I reapplied the commit for Evolution 3.9.91. https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/co

Re: Evolution translation commit reverted

2013-08-21 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 13:21 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Matthew: could you please try to compile it again, changing the > language code in the PO file? I'm trying to compile it but I'm having > some problems with dependencies... The original commit had: -"Language: \n" +"Language

Re: Evolution translation commit reverted

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
It also passes the gtxml check, so it isn't a problem with the PO file structure. Matthew: could you please try to compile it again, changing the language code in the PO file? I'm trying to compile it but I'm having some problems with dependencies... Thanks! 2013/8/21 Christian Kirbach > Ooop

[gnome-dictionary] Created branch gnome-3-9

2013-08-21 Thread Sindhu S
The branch 'gnome-3-9' was created. Summary of new commits: a6b34ee... GNOME Dictionary 3.9.0 (stable) ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: New telepathy-account-widgets module and licensing problems

2013-08-21 Thread Gil Forcada Codinachs
I will do it no problem. I wanted to add it first so that we have stats and later we can discuss where to put it :) Cheers, Gil 2013/8/21 Marco Barisione > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 09:38 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote: > > Does this really belong to the Extra release set or should it be moved > >

Re: New telepathy-account-widgets module and licensing problems

2013-08-21 Thread Marco Barisione
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 09:38 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote: > Does this really belong to the Extra release set or should it be moved > to GNOME 3.10 ? Since both Empathy and GNOME Control Center are > relying on it and shipping in GNOME 3.10, I think it should be moved, > and it would have a higher

Re: New telepathy-account-widgets module and licensing problems

2013-08-21 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Gil Forcada wrote: > For the ones wondering if their language is up-to-date or the usual > always-missing-some-strings see: > https://l10n.gnome.org/module/telepathy-account-widgets/ Does this really belong to the Extra release set or should it be moved to GNOME