Re: Workflows for DL-Transifex co-hosted PO files.

2012-10-21 Thread Dimitris Glezos
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Scenario B: > > A language exists in DL, but not in the Transifex upstream, e.g. > Burmese (Myanmar). > > Obviously it would be desirable, but is it absolutely necessary to > create a corresponding language project upstream in Transifex? Th

Re: Workflows for DL-Transifex co-hosted PO files.

2012-10-21 Thread Andika Triwidada
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Gnome i18n folks, > > There is something I don't really understand about the preferred > workflow for modules listed in Damned Lies that are actually hosted on > external platforms. > > Let me cite just one module as an example. > > The accou

Workflows for DL-Transifex co-hosted PO files.

2012-10-21 Thread Chris Leonard
Gnome i18n folks, There is something I don't really understand about the preferred workflow for modules listed in Damned Lies that are actually hosted on external platforms. Let me cite just one module as an example. The accountsservice module is listed in Damned Lies http://l10n.gnome.org/modu