Hi!
> I'd really like to fix this for 2.30, if not user upgrading tp-butterfly
> would suffer regressions.
Sounds reasonable, 1 of 2 for i18n. For the other strings (the original
mail) I give you 2 of 2.
Please try to be a better citizen in the next cycle ;)
Regards,
Johannes
Hi!
Note that this is no string freeze breaks as Gtk+ isn't following the
GNOME string freeze rules.
But be sure to translate this string ;)
Regards,
Johannes
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 23:02 + schrieb GNOME Status Pages:
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts o
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org.
There have been following string additions to module 'gtk+.gtk-2-18':
+ "Image is corrupted or truncated"
Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it
might be worth investigatin
Hi translators,
Empathy help has a couple more new strings to translate.
This fix a topic that was still referring to an old version of
Empathy. Specifically, now the documentation correctly report that is
possible to join a password protected IRC room.
Sorry again for the inconvenience.
Ciao.
Le vendredi 12 mars 2010 à 20:46 +0100, Mario Blättermann a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> a long time ago Sergej Udaltsov has migrated the Conglomerate manual to
> g-d-u support, and make it translatabel by the xml2po and gettext tools.
> It's difficult to say whether we may expect a new Conglomerate ve
Hi folks,
a long time ago Sergej Udaltsov has migrated the Conglomerate manual to
g-d-u support, and make it translatabel by the xml2po and gettext tools.
It's difficult to say whether we may expect a new Conglomerate version
in the nearest future. But I've seen there were some bugfixes and a lot
Le vendredi 12 mars 2010 à 01:19 +0100, Gabor Kelemen a écrit :
> Guillaume Desmottes írta:
> > Please comment/approve/decline each request separately.
> >
> >
> I think there is not much difference between 2 new strings and 6 new
> strings - the difference is between 0 new string and more than
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:20:32AM +0100, Åsmund Skjæveland wrote:
> does GNOME have an official policy for whether applications should
> use KiB, MiB etc. instead of kB, MB etc. when refering to 1024
> bytes, 1024*1024 bytes etc? Ie. should bug reports be filed if an
No.
> application uses 'kB'
does GNOME have an official policy for whether applications should use
KiB, MiB etc. instead of kB, MB etc. when refering to 1024 bytes,
1024*1024 bytes etc? Ie. should bug reports be filed if an application
uses 'kB' to mean 1024 bytes?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KiB
--
Åsmund Skjæveland
_
