On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 17:15 +0200, Carsten Senger wrote:
> Hi Shaun,
> Hi Danilo,
> Hi all,
>
> I took the liberty to cc Shaun and Danilo as the gnome-doc-utils
> maintainers (I don't know if you're subscribed to this list). If there
> is someone else to be involved that can help feel free to cc.
Hi Shaun,
Hi Danilo,
Hi all,
I took the liberty to cc Shaun and Danilo as the gnome-doc-utils
maintainers (I don't know if you're subscribed to this list). If there
is someone else to be involved that can help feel free to cc.
We are developing a new w.g.o. (with plone again) and work on a trans
Am Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:30:50 +0200 schrieb F Wolff:
> Op Ma, 2009-06-08 om 12:03 + skryf Jens W. Klein:
>> At the end thats what it is all about. But to get there integration
>> work
>> need to be done.
>>
>> In short:
>>
>> 1) Plone has a great system dealing with translations. It does work
Op Ma, 2009-06-08 om 12:03 + skryf Jens W. Klein:
> At the end thats what it is all about. But to get there integration
> work
> need to be done.
>
> In short:
>
> 1) Plone has a great system dealing with translations. It does work
> with
> PO/POT (gettext) on one level (developer-level),
Am Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:35:10 +0200 schrieb Petr Kovar:
> Hi!
>
> Lucas Rocha , Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:05:43 +0100:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> No comments? Just wondering why... Too complex? Couldn't understand?
>
> Yes, from my point of view, I think so. Actually it's obvious, a
> considerable amount of u
I agree!
I have read both links, but to be honest, I have no idea what is so
"new" if I skip upgrade to Plone. I need to know if this "new" gives
me some interesting solutions or is just another never-to-be-used CMS
system. To my experience, CMS makes more work and more problems ... To
my knowledg
