Hi,
I plan to release rhythmbox 0.12.1 in about one week (no earlier than
the 27th). There have been quite a few string changes since 0.12.0,
most of which fall into one of two categories:
- spelling and capitalization corrections in the English strings, which
only require simple changes to t
Hi,
NM 7.1 is out [1], so I'm not sure which branch should be translated ...
Anyone?
[1]
http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/04/16/you-will-upgrade-to-networkmanager-071/
El ds 18 de 04 de 2009 a les 23:48 +0200, en/na Luca Ferretti va
escriure:
> Anybody knows if translation updates for network
On 4/17/09, Sabine Cretella wrote:
> Hi, I would like to start the translation team for Gnome into Neapolitan.
>
> My full name: Sabine Emmy Eller
> E-Mail: s.crete...@gmail.com
> Bugzilla account: s.crete...@gmail.com
> Language name (en): Neapolitan
> Language name (nap): Napulitano
> ISO 639-3
Anybody knows if translation updates for network-manager-* modules
should be performed only in "master" branch, or in
"NETWORKMANAGER_0_7" branch too? In past days I've seen some commits
from mainteiners copying po from master to 0.7 branch, and I don't
know if this is a task they reserve for thems
Le lundi 06 avril 2009 à 20:43 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> We have recently added l10n support for WebKitGTK+. We are still in the
> process of tagging translatable messages, but we should be good to start
> receiving translations from all interested languages.
>
> I would
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 18:32 +, F Wolff a écrit :
> Op Sa, 2009-04-18 om 15:38 +0100 skryf Simos Xenitellis:
>
> ...
>
> > What I would suggest is to try to clone the repositories of the GNOME
> > release,
> > and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> > the GNOME 2.26 Git r
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 20:23 +, Antonio Lima a écrit :
> Sáb, 2009-04-18 às 19:53 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu:
> > Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 18:56 +0200, Jorge González González a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > epiphany-extensions download link is not working at DL, is it because
> > > the
2009/4/18 Simos Xenitellis :
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> C. Just use 'git commit LL.po' so that we specify which file we want
> to add and commit, in one line.
> We do not need to 'git add' the modified files, just use when we have
> to add a new file in the reposit
Sáb, 2009-04-18 às 19:53 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu:
> Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 18:56 +0200, Jorge González González a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > epiphany-extensions download link is not working at DL, is it because
> > the migration is not finished yet?
> >
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/epiphany
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 15:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> I've just created a glib-2-20 branch. Please commit stable bug fixes
> there. master is now open for development towards 2.22. Further 2.20.x
> releases will be made off the glib-2-20 branch.
Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated.
Claude
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 20:47 +0200, Benoît Dejean a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I've branched libgtop.
> Stable branched is gnome-2-26.
> Dev happens in master.
Thanks, l10n.gnome.org updated.
Claude
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http:/
I've just created a glib-2-20 branch. Please commit stable bug fixes
there. master is now open for development towards 2.22. Further 2.20.x
releases will be made off the glib-2-20 branch.
Matthias
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://m
Op Sa, 2009-04-18 om 17:45 +0200 skryf Johannes Schmid:
> Hi!
>
> Am Samstag, den 18.04.2009, 17:16 +0200 schrieb Frederic Peters:
> > Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> >
> > > and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> > > the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your dis
Hello,
I've branched libgtop.
Stable branched is gnome-2-26.
Dev happens in master.
Regards,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_
Op Sa, 2009-04-18 om 15:38 +0100 skryf Simos Xenitellis:
...
> What I would suggest is to try to clone the repositories of the GNOME
> release,
> and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your disk.
> If you were to downloa
2009/4/18 Johannes Schmid
> Hi!
>
> Am Samstag, den 18.04.2009, 17:16 +0200 schrieb Frederic Peters:
> > Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> >
> > > and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> > > the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your disk.
> >
> > 2.6GB, but that doe
El sáb, 18-04-2009 a las 19:53 +0200, Claude Paroz escribió:
> Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 18:56 +0200, Jorge González González a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > epiphany-extensions download link is not working at DL, is it because
> > the migration is not finished yet?
> >
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/ep
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 18:56 +0200, Jorge González González a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> epiphany-extensions download link is not working at DL, is it because
> the migration is not finished yet?
>
> http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/epiphany-extensions.master/epiphany-extensions.master.es.po
This happened wh
Hi,
epiphany-extensions download link is not working at DL, is it because
the migration is not finished yet?
http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/epiphany-extensions.master/epiphany-extensions.master.es.po
Thank you very much.
--
Jorge González González
Weblog: http://aloriel.no-ip.org
Fotolog: http://ww
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>> Il giorno sab, 18/04/2009 alle 16.08 +0100, Simos Xenitellis ha scritto:
>> >
>> > If there is an existing it.po in the repository, it is not required to
>> > 'git add'.
>>
>> Hmmm... my 'git help add' says I have to do it even i
Johannes Schmid wrote:
> > > and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> > > the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your disk.
> >
> > 2.6GB, but that doesn't count some big repositories, for exemple gimp
> > and gnumeric are both over 200MB.
>
> Actually the who
Hi!
Am Samstag, den 18.04.2009, 17:16 +0200 schrieb Frederic Peters:
> Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
> > and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> > the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your disk.
>
> 2.6GB, but that doesn't count some big repositories, for exemp
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 17:16 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
> > and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> > the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your disk.
>
> 2.6GB, but that doesn't count some big repositories, for exemple gi
Hi!
> Il giorno sab, 18/04/2009 alle 16.08 +0100, Simos Xenitellis ha scritto:
> >
> > If there is an existing it.po in the repository, it is not required to
> > 'git add'.
>
> Hmmm... my 'git help add' says I have to do it even if I modify one
> file.
>
> If I try to 'git commit' without 'git
Hi,
Il giorno sab, 18/04/2009 alle 16.08 +0100, Simos Xenitellis ha scritto:
>
> If there is an existing it.po in the repository, it is not required to
> 'git add'.
Hmmm... my 'git help add' says I have to do it even if I modify one
file.
If I try to 'git commit' without 'git add' before, it sa
Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> and keep those on your system. We now know the figures;
> the GNOME 2.26 Git repositories would take about 2.6GB on your disk.
2.6GB, but that doesn't count some big repositories, for exemple gimp
and gnumeric are both over 200MB.
Frederic
_
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 04:24:18PM +0200, Milo Casagrande wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions/doubts/things I can't understand quite well right
> now with git and how to use branches.
>
> I was trying to commit+push a new Italian translation for gtk+ 2-16
> branch, since looks like it has one
2009/4/18 Milo Casagrande :
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions/doubts/things I can't understand quite well right
> now with git and how to use branches.
>
> I was trying to commit+push a new Italian translation for gtk+ 2-16
> branch, since looks like it has one string left:
>
> http://l10n.gnome.org/
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Yannig MARCHEGAY wrote:
> 2009/4/18 DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
>>
>> > I'm trying to understand everything about git. Do someone know how I
>> > could
>> > batch-download all GNOME po directories? I made such a script for SVN,
>> > if
>> > someone made the same for git
Hi,
I have some questions/doubts/things I can't understand quite well right
now with git and how to use branches.
I was trying to commit+push a new Italian translation for gtk+ 2-16
branch, since looks like it has one string left:
http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gtk+/gtk-2-16/po/it
I switched to
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Claude Paroz wrote:
> Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 à 22:38 +0100, Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Claude Paroz wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > l10n.gnome.org is now up-to-date regarding the git migration, excepting
>> > the famous seahorse-pl
2009/4/18 DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
> > I'm trying to understand everything about git. Do someone know how I
> could
> > batch-download all GNOME po directories? I made such a script for SVN, if
> > someone made the same for git, it would be great. I'd love not to have to
> > download whole repositor
> I'm trying to understand everything about git. Do someone know how I could
> batch-download all GNOME po directories? I made such a script for SVN, if
> someone made the same for git, it would be great. I'd love not to have to
> download whole repositories with a lot of files I don't need for
> t
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 à 22:38 +0100, Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > l10n.gnome.org is now up-to-date regarding the git migration, excepting
> > the famous seahorse-plugins module.
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to understand everything about git. Do someone know how I could
batch-download all GNOME po directories? I made such a script for SVN, if
someone made the same for git, it would be great. I'd love not to have to
download whole repositories with a lot of files I don't ne
Le samedi 18 avril 2009 à 00:09 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit :
> On 4/17/09, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > As per summary, could someone add this to list?
>
> Cryptic mail; took me a few seconds to figure out.
>
> Added now: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnote/
Note that this module is a rewrite of
2009-04-18 klockan 08:30 skrev Johannes Schmid:
> > I want to know if there is certain easy way of only checking out po
> > dir certain module with git. While we are using CVS and SVN, we as
> > committers can only checkout po dir of certain module, which will
> > reduce network traffic a lot for l
Ok ... found out what happened.
Gmail for some strange reason still had the w&m.it address in there - well
obviously I did not take it out, but nobody ever complained in 2 years time
and I always get the messages of the various mailing lists here - so ...
really strange, but it happened.
Sorry.
Hi, strange that my very old wordsandmore.it e-mail was used ... that one
does not work anymore. And I took it out from i-iter - really strange.
Anyway the mailing list is empty, just because for now I am working with
only one person, Carmine Colacino, and we have direct correspondance. But if
fu
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Gil Forcada wrote:
> Which version is the new one? 1.6.2.x? Because I have a 1.6.0.x and it
> doesn't allow me to skip the -b and the local branch name.
I tried with 1.6.2.x.
The -b issue with --track has been resolved in Git 1.6.1,
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/2
On 4/18/09, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I've just created a stable gtk-2-16 branch.
> Future 2.16.x releases will be made off that branch, while development
> towards 2.18 proceeds on master.
Thanks, http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gtk%2B/ updated.
Christian
2009/4/18 Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle :
>
> I understand you are volunteering to review pt_BR translations of
> WebKitGTK+, but I don't believe the WebKitGTK+ team will be able to
> review e. g. Arabic, French and Nepalese translations. If the WebKitGTK+
> team is concerned with PO files being wel
42 matches
Mail list logo
