2009-03-12 klockan 19:31 skrev Andre Klapper:
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.03.2009, 18:17 + schrieb GNOME Status Pages:
> > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> > http://l10n.gnome.org.
> > There have been following string additions to module
> > 'hamster-applet.gn
2009-03-12 klockan 19:58 skrev Claude Paroz:
> Please STOP this thread. This does not lead anywhere.
Agreed. There is no point in pointing fingers, and there is no point in
heating up this discussion since it leads us nowhere.
I think we (the Gnome community as a whole) do a really great job: the
Le jeudi 12 mars 2009 à 19:32 +0100, Jorge González González a écrit :
> El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 08:29 -0300, Jonh Wendell escribió:
> > Em Ter, 2009-03-03 às 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen escreveu:
> > > 2009/3/3 Johannes Schmid :
> > > > Anyway, of course bug-fixing mostly starts after string fre
El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 08:29 -0300, Jonh Wendell escribió:
> Em Ter, 2009-03-03 às 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen escreveu:
> > 2009/3/3 Johannes Schmid :
> > > Anyway, of course bug-fixing mostly starts after string freeze because
> > > it's in the last weeks were a lot of polishing happens.
> >
Am Donnerstag, den 12.03.2009, 18:17 + schrieb GNOME Status Pages:
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org.
>
> There have been following string additions to module
> 'hamster-applet.gnome-2-26':
>
> + "name"
>
> Note that this doesn't
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org.
There have been following string additions to module
'hamster-applet.gnome-2-26':
+ "name"
Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it
might be worth investigating.
___
Hi!
> If I just "forget" about the procedures I am supposed to adhere to when I use
> SVN account, developers will have my head on a plate. If I just "forget"
> about the release schedule for GNOME that just means that my translations
> doesn't make it in, and the Danish users will suffer.
>
>
>> The responses from the developers indicate quite clearly that they
>> are not satisfied with the methods of string freeze.
>> Presently a number of developers, are deliberately breaking the
>> string freeze and thereby creating trouble for translators.
>> The argument seems to be: "We break stri
