Re: New team for [Persian, Old (ca.600-400 B.C.)] ([peo])

2008-05-30 Thread Petr Kovar
David Lodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fri, 30 May 2008 07:16:24 -0400: > Quoting Roozbeh Pournader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Are you sure? You want to translate GNOME into a language that has not > > been spoken for 24 centuries and its whole corpus can fit in one book? > > There is precedence for dece

Re: New team for [Persian, Old (ca.600-400 B.C.)] ([peo])

2008-05-30 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:16 AM, David Lodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is precedence for deceased languages in Gnome - there is an Olde > Englisc team (ang) (though nothing's been done for a few years) as there is > for Latin. But I don't think Mazdak can really translate GNOME to the Old

Re: New team for [Persian, Old (ca.600-400 B.C.)] ([peo])

2008-05-30 Thread Thomas Thurman
Ysgrifennodd David Lodge: > There is precedence for deceased languages in Gnome - there is an Olde > Englisc team (ang) (though nothing's been done for a few years) as > there is for Latin. ISTR trying to contact the Latin contact at some point and not getting a response. I wonder whether I

Re: New team for [Persian, Old (ca.600-400 B.C.)] ([peo])

2008-05-30 Thread David Lodge
Quoting Roozbeh Pournader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are you sure? You want to translate GNOME into a language that has not > been spoken for 24 centuries and its whole corpus can fit in one book? There is precedence for deceased languages in Gnome - there is an Olde Englisc team (ang) (though nothi