Re: Patch to get rid of contractions in Nautilus strings

2008-04-01 Thread Shaun McCance
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 13:45 +0200, F Wolff wrote: > Op Dinsdag 2008-04-01 skryf Cosimo Cecchi: > > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:29 +0200, Jorge González wrote: > > > > > 40 new fuzzy strings, extra work for translators which is quite useless > > > IMHO. > > > > I'm sorry about this, but I posted a m

Re: Patch to get rid of contractions in Nautilus strings

2008-04-01 Thread F Wolff
Op Dinsdag 2008-04-01 skryf Cosimo Cecchi: > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:29 +0200, Jorge González wrote: > > > 40 new fuzzy strings, extra work for translators which is quite useless > > IMHO. > > I'm sorry about this, but I posted a mail to this list on Saturday to > get comments before committing

Re: Patch to get rid of contractions in Nautilus strings

2008-04-01 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:29 +0200, Jorge González wrote: > 40 new fuzzy strings, extra work for translators which is quite useless IMHO. I'm sorry about this, but I posted a mail to this list on Saturday to get comments before committing and the general consensus was positive, so I went ahead. -

Re: Patch to get rid of contractions in Nautilus strings

2008-04-01 Thread Jorge González
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Cosimo Cecchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 17:01 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've made an updated patch for bug #145356 [1] to get rid of > > contractions in Nautilus strings according to GNOME Documentation Style > > Guide

Re: Patch to get rid of contractions in Nautilus strings

2008-04-01 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 17:01 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > I've made an updated patch for bug #145356 [1] to get rid of > contractions in Nautilus strings according to GNOME Documentation Style > Guide. I'd like to commit it to trunk now that Nautilus has been > branched, but before that I'