On 16/08/2006, at 10:49 AM, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> Em Ter, 2006-08-15 às 23:11 +0930, Clytie Siddall escreveu:
>> I hope we're still going ahead with it. Does anyone have some more
>> up-
>> to-date information?
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-July/
> msg00
Em Ter, 2006-08-15 às 23:11 +0930, Clytie Siddall escreveu:
> I hope we're still going ahead with it. Does anyone have some more up-
> to-date information?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-July/msg00798.html
___
gnome-i18n mailing
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2006, 14:00 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> I'll do that after 2.10.2 is out. The intention was to avoid loosing
> an almost correct translation (at least good enough to convey the intent
> of the warning) in the imminent release...
Please leave the German translation unt
Found this in bugzilla and I think it would be nice to get it commited.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155854
Index: libgnomeprintui/gnome-print-copies.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/libgnomeprintui/libgnomeprintui/gnome-print
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 19:48 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> On 8/15/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have fixed bug 351063, which leads to a changed string in 2.10.2:
> >
> > <%s> element has neither a \"name\" nor an \"id\" element
> >
> > is factually wrong, and has been replac
On 8/15/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have fixed bug 351063, which leads to a changed string in 2.10.2:
>
> <%s> element has neither a \"name\" nor an \"id\" element
>
> is factually wrong, and has been replaced by
>
> <%s> element has neither a \"name\" nor an \"id\" attribute
I have fixed bug 351063, which leads to a changed string in 2.10.2:
<%s> element has neither a \"name\" nor an \"id\" element
is factually wrong, and has been replaced by
<%s> element has neither a \"name\" nor an \"id\" attribute
I have performed the necessary surgery on all po files to keep
Hi all :)
The SVN migration page in the wiki [1] looks a bit sad. :(
I hope we're still going ahead with it. Does anyone have some more up-
to-date information?
SVN is a major part of my workflow now, with only my GNOME working
copy still waiting to shift over from CVS. I'd like to get that
